Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion > XDM or M9A1??

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2011, 09:59 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TheSadPanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Louis,Missouri
Posts: 1,290
Liked 374 Times on 248 Posts
Likes Given: 59

Default XDM or M9A1??

Let me run through the basics of what I was looking for and why I chose these two pistols to compare. The two exact pistols are the Springfield XDM compact 9mm and the the Beretta M9A1. I already own a Glock 23 and and don't have the desire to own another one just yet. I liked 1911s in 9mm but they were too expensive. I will NOT have the opportunity to shoot either of these before I buy. (which is also why I'm looking for input here) The gun will be used for plinking and fun, nothing serious except as a possible backup HD pistol behind the G23 should I decide to sell it.

Characteristics I am looking for:
- A gun that has many positive reviews (well tested)
- 9mm
- One that I REALLY like the grip on (I have held both and enjoyed them)
- available for around <= $600
- It must be aesthetically pleasing (to a degree)
- getting the most for my money

So what do you all think? Which one should I start really looking into? I am interested to see what you all say

P.S.- If you have another gun that you think would fit the bill please say so! I'll gladly consider it, but I do still have these two in mind.

__________________

"You know what happens to men who go looking for blood? They find it." - Kind Old Man

TheSadPanda is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-20-2011, 11:50 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pasco,Washington
Posts: 76
Default

I can not say much about the Springfield because I have never shot one. I have spent countless hours with an M9. M9s are great pistols, extremely reliable and very durable. There is a reason the Military has used them since the early 90s, although the Army and Air Force are both going to be replacing the M9 by FY 2013 I believe.

__________________
Jared is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 12:23 AM   #3
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,129
Liked 2743 Times on 1591 Posts
Likes Given: 1202

Default

Have you thought about a Hi-Power or one of the clones?

__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 12:33 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mesinge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I own both and I can't decide which to advise you to buy. Both are ergonomic, both have been perfectly reliable, both are high capacity, and both are very accurate. I would give a slight edge in accuracy to my 92FS, but it is negligible.

It comes down to training. It is harder to learn how to transition from the heavier DA first shot to the subsequent lighter SA shots on the Beretta than to just have the same trigger pull weight of the XDm for every shot. Its not impossible at all but requires more training to do properly. Furthermore, the Beretta has a manual safety that the XDm does not. I personally ignore the safety and simply use it as a decocker. I decock the weapon and flip the safety off and carry like a DA revolver.

The third and fourth guns I would suggest would be a BHP and a CZ-75.
.

__________________
www.pistol-talk.com

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!

Last edited by mesinge2; 05-21-2011 at 12:44 AM.
mesinge2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 12:53 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1419 Times on 808 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

You need to broaden your search!

The best 9 mike mike this old fart has ever shot. < and yes, that's a period!



The P-35 Browning Hi-Power meets each of your criteria (you will need to experience the grip) plus two additional;

  • It's not tupperware and,
  • it's not a big heavy Mil-spec Beretta

Panda, you need to shoot one of these before you make your decision.

__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 01:18 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TheSadPanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Louis,Missouri
Posts: 1,290
Liked 374 Times on 248 Posts
Likes Given: 59

Default

I have considered a Hi-Power (almost wrote "High-Power" )But there are none available locally so I don't have any way of trying out the grip. I've checked about 4 different stores, and they just don't have it. That makes me a sad panda I looked up the price on Bud's and they want $800, that is far out of my price range.

I had looked into the CZ75s, but, they bugged me, for some reason that I can't even begin to explain.

I'll try to throw in some of the things I thought of as bonuses and things I didn't like when deciding between these two

Reasons why I liked the XDM:
- Liked the grip more than M9
- Was really light
- Handle seemed kind of small (but I still fit fine), and WAY too big (tall not wide) with the extensions. I have pretty small hands
- Light rail (because I'm tacti-cool! jk)
- Loved the trigger
- Can possibly carry in the future

Reasons why I liked the M9A1:
- I think it looks better than the XDM
- I already have a polymer pistol, and would like an all metal one
- Handle fit better height-wise
- Also has a light rail
- Liked the manual safety

these are just random things I liked and disliked

__________________

"You know what happens to men who go looking for blood? They find it." - Kind Old Man


Last edited by TheSadPanda; 05-21-2011 at 01:33 AM.
TheSadPanda is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 01:49 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mach1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 364
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

SadPanda I personally have lots of experience with the M9A1 (NAVY) they really are great guns. super durable good accuracy. parts every where. having said that I have the XDM and i love it. Like a awesome cross between a 1911 and a glock. (not a glock fan by the way) I really love my XDM the only issue i have with it is mags are kinda expensive. shoots extremely well and not big or bulky at all. i would say its every bit as durable as the
M9A1. Just a personal preference really butlike te M better plus larger capacity mags tho not by much.

__________________

"Which is heavier a soldiers pack or a slaves chains" Napoleon
"We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home."Thomas Jefferson
"You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one."
-- Rush Limbaugh, in a moment of unaccustomed profundity
"No combat-ready unit ever passed inspection, and no inspection-ready unit ever passed combat."

mach1337 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 02:11 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mesinge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mach1337 View Post
the M better plus larger capacity mags
Not really, if you use Mec-gar optium mags the capacity jumps to 18+1 with a flush fit. This mag makes it only one round less than the XDm. Also, the Mec-gar mags I have used have much better finishes than Beretta mags and I never had a jam with one either.
.
__________________
www.pistol-talk.com

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!
mesinge2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 02:18 AM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,371
Liked 234 Times on 186 Posts
Likes Given: 29

Default

I'm going to somewhat echo what others have already mentioned...

I have an XDm (45acp) and have some experience with the M9/92fs. In my experience, both would rate about the same. Probably a solid B+ for both were I to give them a "letter grade".

Neither makes an ideal carry weapon due to size, both are excellent range/home defense handguns. I would probably choose the XDm for myself for two reasons of personal taste:

1) I really like the OD/stainless finish available for the XDm9, and it's just an all-around solid platform.

2) While I like the M9, I think similar steel/alloy 9mms better suit my priorities. My personal taste would rank the BHP (slimmer, lighter, more carry-friendly) and CZ 75 (reasonably slim, heavy, but great ergonomics and price) as the best values. I also think used Sigs (P226/228/229/239), the 4-digit S&W models, and even CZ 75 and BHP clones are pretty attactive options when it comes to hard body 9mm.

The bottom line is this- Everyone has their likes and dislikes. You'll find a ton of CZ and BHP fans chiming in on this criteria, and for darn good reason. I almost never hear a bad word spoken about either. But as long as concealed carry is not a factor, both of the two guns you mention are solid choices.

These are my 9mm hard bodies of choice. They are of equal quality in my opinion, but the BHP is the more carry friendly of the two. I've got less than $550 into each, including extra mags.

__________________
"The Future is Unwritten"

Last edited by sweeper22; 05-21-2011 at 02:21 AM.
sweeper22 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 02:28 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,815
Liked 762 Times on 441 Posts
Likes Given: 457

Default

Sold my 92FS and picked up, well bought haven't picked it up yet, a 9mm CZ Compact.

Comparing a M9 against a XDm compact is a bit of an apples and oranges...one is a polymer compact made for CCW the other is a...well a beast. At 32 oz. empty it's a sidearm, not an EDC. Both are great guns, accurate, reliable and a blast to shoot...just a different purpose for each is all.



Not shown actual size...

__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Beretta 90-two or M9A1? sonf Semi-Auto Handguns 21 10-13-2011 01:00 AM
Molded holster for M9A1 sonf Firearm Accessories & Gear 20 10-08-2011 09:28 PM