Supposedly a Revolver Looses alot of energy from the chamber barrel gap according to
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion > Supposedly a Revolver Looses alot of energy from the chamber barrel gap according to

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2011, 08:15 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CAMCHAMPION1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: American Southwest
Posts: 58
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default Supposedly a Revolver Looses alot of energy from the chamber barrel gap according to

I read a Forum Post on a Google Result page a couple of weeks ago about a guy claiming you loose a lot propellant gases/energy. On a Revolver through the gap between the Chamber and the Barrel. He claims that therefore a Bullet fired from any revolver would be a really week round fired. WHAT HOW STUPID IS THIS GUY TO EVEN MAKE SUCH A OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM.

I just wanted to get your take on this?????

I mean the amount of escaping propellant gasses/energy from the gap between the chamber and barrel is so microscopic. That it is not gonna make a difference in the power behind the bullet.

Then again you have people who don't believe that the trip to the moon really happened.


CAMCHAMPION1988 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-27-2011, 08:34 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chainfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,879
Liked 1727 Times on 1029 Posts
Likes Given: 374

Default

The fact is, it is correct. You lose pressure through the gap. Just not enough to matter a hell of a lot.

The Nagant pistol addressed just that issue. The cylinder moved forward and the brass projected into the forcing cone to make a "gas seal" revolver. The pistol was not copied because it was a non-issue.


__________________
"It is better to be too skeptical then too credulous"

Carl Sagan
Chainfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 09:35 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 18,019
Liked 10557 Times on 4561 Posts
Likes Given: 1697

Default

Yes, there is a loss of gas at the cylinder gap.
See the flash?

revolver.jpg

That's why you don't want your hand THERE. But as said, the revolver was designed around that. Two identical .38 Specials- one fired in a revolver, one fired in single shot pistol, such as a Contender, the single WILL get more energy.

The comment is rather boneheaded, since I fail to see .460s, 500 S&Ws as a "weak" cartridge.

BTW, I notice there is a measurable space between the cylinder rings and cylinder walls in the engine of my truck. Using his logic, that will run only poorly and weakly.
__________________
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 12:09 AM   #4
jyo
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 230
Liked 19 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Yeah, you lose a little because of the gap---but not much---I wouldn't worry about it---revolvers have been laying people and animals low since about 1873---it's not perfect, but it works!
jyo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 12:46 AM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 18,019
Liked 10557 Times on 4561 Posts
Likes Given: 1697

Default

JYO, actally, Sam Colt got his first patent in 1832.
__________________
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 01:51 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9211 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

Yeah the energy loss is minuscule. I think something like 10 or 15 fps of MV, if it's even that much. Run towards the target while firing to make up for that.
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 02:22 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,325
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

And C3 knows about Sam Colt's patent because he was in the reviewing office at the time.
freefall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 02:31 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cleator,AZ
Posts: 3,560
Liked 837 Times on 537 Posts
Likes Given: 256

Default

Thats why when you see some velocities listed "from a vented barrel" it is supposed to mimic a revolver velocity.
__________________
Just walking on the edge of of my grave.
hiwall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 02:59 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9211 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freefall
And C3 knows about Sam Colt's patent because he was in the reviewing office at the time.
And inventing the internet with thomas jefferson.
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 10:52 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlueTurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 1,030
Liked 45 Times on 31 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

I have a load for my .44 mag that is 265 grains coming out at about 1400 fps. I know this because I used my chronograph to test it. That is enough velocity for me. There has to be some pressure loss between the cylinder and barrel but as said above, not enough to be overly concerned about.


BlueTurf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
I have to say this would be alot of fun... Shade Hunting Forum 13 11-22-2011 02:05 AM
Automatic barrel/chamber question DarinCraft General Shotgun Discussion 3 02-17-2011 08:45 AM
AK-74 jams alot. ragstoriches AK & SKS Discussion 16 12-05-2010 01:33 AM
Is it me or does the XD looks alot like Glock? StanDJ77 General Handgun Discussion 9 08-11-2010 06:42 AM
laser under revolver barrel? nottelybill Revolver Handguns 15 07-23-2010 12:21 PM



Newest Threads