You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com >

# Stopping Power Measurement

02-08-2012, 09:52 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Seattle,Washington
Posts: 25
Stopping Power Measurement

Do we look at velocity or energy? I am looking at the specs for .357 sig and 10 mm auto on wikipedia.

 Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free! Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more. Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information. Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here

02-08-2012, 10:44 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cleator,AZ
Posts: 4,227
Liked 1303 Times on 841 Posts
Likes Given: 316

velocity and weight = energy

__________________
Just walking on the edge of of my grave.

02-08-2012, 11:36 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 804
Liked 27 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 67

The Hatcher Formula

The Hatcher Formula is an attempt to mathematically evaluate the approximate effectiveness of pistol ammunition at incapacitating a person. Developed by Gen. Julian Hatcher in the 1930's, it uses the bullet momentum, frontal area, velocity, and a 'form factor.'

The formula is:

RSP = M * A * F

Where RSP = Relative Stopping Power Index, M = Momentum of the bullet in foot pounds, A = Area of the bullet in square inches, F = Form factor derived from his observations with some additions for later bullet types.

http://www.abaris.net/info/ballistics/hatcher-table.htm

02-09-2012, 12:40 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Arcata,California
Posts: 394
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 5

The following article sort of rambles on and is pretty long, but it will raise some questions in your mind that you'll want to consider as you further ponder your original question.

http://www.gunthorp.com/Terminal%20Ballistics%20as%20viewed%20in%20a%20mor gue.htm

__________________
"Society’s abuse, misuse, or lack of use of its rights will not impinge upon my rights."

02-09-2012, 04:51 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 16,143
Liked 15113 Times on 7559 Posts
Likes Given: 14211

The truth is that no handgun round has reliable stopping power, without a CNS hit.

Rifles are a bit different, as Roy Weatherby learned shooting hundreds of head of cattle in carefully controlled experiments. Velocity was the deciding factor, but in order for the velocity to become the deciding, it had to exceed 2650-2700 FPS in order to generate hydrostatic shock.

Those of us old enough to remember the Russian-Afghanistan war, remember the Afghans complaining to the U.N. that the Russians were using "poison" bullets.

That was when the Soviet Union switched from the large, heavy 7.62X39 in the AK-47 to the light, fast 5.45X39 in the AK74. The increase in lethality of the smaller, higher velocity round was very dramatic.

In reality, momentum is a meaningless figure, since it gives equal weighting to mass and velocity, rather than factoring in the square of the velocity. (energy). Even energy has little effect compared to velocity.
__________________
To the world, you may be only one person. but to one person you may be the world.

GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP

02-10-2012, 12:49 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Roscommon,Michigan
Posts: 178
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Quote:
 Originally Posted by hiwall velocity and weight = energy
According to Wikipedia: Kinetic energy = 1/2Mass x Velocity squared.

02-10-2012, 01:48 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 16,143
Liked 15113 Times on 7559 Posts
Likes Given: 14211

Quote:
 Originally Posted by roscoguy According to Wikipedia: Kinetic energy = 1/2Mass x Velocity squared.
Correct formula. Makes it easy to see why "momentum" is a meaningless measurement.
__________________
To the world, you may be only one person. but to one person you may be the world.

GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP

02-10-2012, 02:16 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Arcata,California
Posts: 394
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Quote:
 Originally Posted by locutus Correct formula. Makes it easy to see why "momentum" is a meaningless measurement.

Are you suggesting that Newton's Laws are all wrong?
__________________
"Society’s abuse, misuse, or lack of use of its rights will not impinge upon my rights."

02-10-2012, 03:29 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Incline Village,NV
Posts: 156

Quote:
 Originally Posted by heavygargoyle Do we look at velocity or energy? I am looking at the specs for .357 sig and 10 mm auto on wikipedia.
I like Taylor Knock Out or TKO

TKO = Bullet Mass (gr) x Expanded Bullet Diameter (in) x Terminal Velocity (fps) / 7000

or momentum x expanded diameter

Taylor first described this measure of stopping power in his classic work "African Rifles and Cartridges." Taylor referred to number generated by the equation as the "Knock Out Value" or "Strike Energy." Common practice today is to refer to this value as the "Taylor KO factor" or simply "Taylor KO."

The TKO has no physical meaning and is strictly used as a figure of merit for comparing cartridges. Its main advantage is the ability to attempt to represent complex terminal ballistics as a number; specifically momentum x expanded diameter. This can be utilized to assign different wounding capabilities to projectiles.

It does have good general correlation. For example, the TKO of a .22Mag is about 2, a .38Spcl about 6, a .357 about 10, the 10mm, .44Spcl and .45acp all about 13, a .44Mag 17 and a .454Casull at least 30. Clearly the TKOs are, at least loosely, tracking stopping power. You can't really say that about energy because a .22Mag produces more energy than a .380acp AND a .38Spcl. Momentum works a little better but still has problems: .22Mags and .380acps have about the same momentum and some .38Spcl+Ps have more momentum than .357Mags.

02-10-2012, 03:30 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Incline Village,NV
Posts: 156

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jeepergeo Are you suggesting that Newton's Laws are all wrong?
I suspect not, just that momentum is not an entirely meaningful estimate of stopping power (it's also not meaningless, just imperfect).

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post Broke124 Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 21 12-27-2011 02:33 AM 97cobra Semi-Auto Handguns 88 10-02-2011 01:12 AM LONGHAIR Semi-Auto Handguns 20 07-07-2011 04:34 AM Dillinger 1911 Forum 27 05-24-2010 11:28 AM