You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion >

Ruger vs Browning (22 semi auto)

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2009, 11:59 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Default Ruger vs Browning (22 semi auto)

Hey, I've just started looking at .22 semi automatic pistols and I've been recommended two brands... Ruger and Browning.

I've only just started pistol shooting so really all I want is something accurate and reliable to get me started. I've been assured that both of these brands will do the job but I was wondering if anyone on here could recommend one over the other? I'm leaning towards the Browning because I've been told they are almost indestructible... suggestions?

Eileen is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 08-11-2009, 12:23 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts

Default browning vote

You really can't go wrong with either.

I have a buckmark and I've shot thousands of rounds through it. It's very accurate and a fun pistol to shoot, great trigger too.

Ruger vs Browning (22 semi auto) - General Handgun Discussion

Gojubrian is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 12:50 PM   #3
Lifetime Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,309
Liked 735 Times on 504 Posts
Likes Given: 231

Default Ruger vs. Browning

Eileen, another choice would be the Beretta Neo line of .22lr. pistols. My wife and I both have one and they shoot great. She likes the grip frame
on the Beretta much better than the Ruger or Browning pieces.It fits her hand more comfortably. She even picked up a grip with blue inserts to personalize her gun. She shoots it very well and has alot of confidence with the Beretta. I personally think they are kind of homely, but I cannot argue how well they shoot. Just another option for you to consider. They come in different barrel lengths, finish, and grip frame options.

Good shooting,
yazul42 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 01:48 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
stalkingbear's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 4,054
Liked 434 Times on 251 Posts
Likes Given: 214


The Browning Buckmark is a great .22 pistol, very accurate and well built. In .22s, I'm a Ruger freak however. Yes they are difficult to field strip UNTIL you get somebody to walk you through the process. It's hard for me to imagine anything this side of a S&W model 41 to be as (or more) accurate than a Ruger however. I have a mk 2 slabside that groups under 1" groups AT 50 YARDS from the bench off bags. Both will be more accurate than you ever will be. The Browning will likely have a better trigger out of box & the Ruger has tons of aftermarket accs available. The bottom line is you're not going to go wrong with either-just be SURE to handle both & see which fits/points most naturally for you. Which feels better in YOUR hand? which grip/angle feels best? Handle them side by side if you can.
Sometimes you earthlings REALLY amaze me!
stalkingbear is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:13 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Prince Frederick,Maryland
Posts: 239
Liked 24 Times on 17 Posts


I have several Ruger MK II & IIIs. I prefer them to the Brownings and others, but it is strictly a matter of personal preference. Try to at least handle any gun you are considering and pick the one that suits you.
Clem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 11:33 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6

OK thanks for the help guys. I think that I will go for the Browning Buck Mark. If the Browning is easier to strip down than a Ruger, for a beginner like me that would be quite welcome, and if the trigger is better straight out of the box then that's a plus as well.

The Browning sounds like it's quality made. Has anyone had any problems with firing pins breaking or stuff like that?
Eileen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 12:10 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 31 Times on 7 Posts


You'll hear lots about Ruger's being tough to takedown and reassemble but it's just not true. The Buckmark on the other hand requires a tool to take apart as you must remove the rear sight base to break it down. If you follow the simple sequenced instructions, Rugers are a piece of cake.

Much more aftermarket stuff available for Rugers as well and mags are cheaper. I had a Buckmark (very ammo picky), but now I have 2 Rugers...

NGIB is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Browning semi-auto 22. cal long rifle Jonny4089 .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 4 09-28-2013 10:19 PM
Browning .22 semi-auto rifle randlyn .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 11 10-22-2010 01:41 PM
Which .22 semi auto NitroxAZ General Handgun Discussion 18 07-09-2009 05:29 PM
semi-auto for $100? ExtinguisherArm AK & SKS Discussion 4 05-10-2008 08:58 AM