Raging Bull .44mag recoil vs a G20 (10mm?).


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion > Raging Bull .44mag recoil vs a G20 (10mm?).

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2011, 02:40 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default Raging Bull .44mag recoil vs a G20 (10mm?).

I have been really wanting to pick up a .44mag Raging Bull, in the 8" barrel length. However, I want to make sure the recoi won't cause me to develop a flinch. The most unpleasant gun I've ever shot was actually my KelTec PF9, even with basic ammo. It isn't terrible, but I usually can only shoot 2 or 3 mags in succession without starting to flinch (at which point I just put a few through my other guns and go back to it). It is just very snappy, like slapping a baseball bat into your palm. I have shot a G20 with 180gr handloads coming out at 1400fps, and it actually wasn't as bad as my PF9. The same guy also had reportedly hotter handloads out of some 4" S&W.41mag revolver, but I don't remember their specifics and it didn't seem any worse than the pistol (probably offset by the heavier firearm). In any case, I shot those guns better than their owner did.

I have read all over that the heavier weight and ported barrel of the longer Raging Bulls really tame the recoil of even hotter .44mag loads, turning it into more of a "shove" than a "snap." But, I am just curious how the standard loads of 240gr@1400fps from a 4+lb Bull would compare to those hot 10mm and .41mag loads from those obviously smaller guns?
Do you guys think I'd have a problem with these .44 loads?

*edit*

And I wanted to say I was just figuring the 10mm loads could make for a decent comparison because they come out with 75% the momentum (180gr vs 240gr at the same velocity), but from a pistol with half the barrel length (i.e. a stouter charge to get the bullet out that fast), without muzzle compensation, and about 55% the weight of the Bull in question. Those recoil calculators on the web say both setups would produce the same amount of recoil energy, though the G20 would have a higher recoil velocity over a shorter time which would logicaly be interpreted as having a "snappier" recoil rather than the oft-described "push" of the Bulls. Is this assessment accurate?



__________________

Last edited by Lindenwood; 02-11-2011 at 03:13 AM.
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-11-2011, 03:22 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
skullcrusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio,Ohio
Posts: 10,949
Liked 17 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I don't know about your loads, but you are talking apples to oranges. A large bore revolver with a long barrel vs. a semi-auto shorter barrel in a smaller load.

I've shot the Raging Bull in .454 Casull with the 8-3/8" barrel and I can tell you that it does not hurt to shoot. It does make the ground shake, but not flinching.

Smaller, lighter guns will give you the recoil that makes one flinch if it hurts to shoot. The Raging Bull with the 8-3/8" barrel in .44 mag should (imo) produce less felt recoil over a 10mm poly. It is a different kind of recoil that you should notice right away.



__________________
skullcrusher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 04:02 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Yeah, I know it is not really a direct comparison. I guess I'm trying to ask something more like, "if hot 10mm loads from a medium-sized pistol don't hurt, will those .44mag loads from a big Bull feel much worse?" But, your example is a good start!

Thanks!

Anyone else have experience with these two firearms (or similar, of course) that could describe the recoil?

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 05:58 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
michigan0626's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 763
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

Genitron.com-awesome website

Genitron.com: Details for Taurus 444 Raging Bull .44 Remington Magnum Revolver
Raging Bull 44 MAG recoil factor-15.2 lbs

Genitron.com: Details for Glock 20 10mm Auto Pistol
Glock G20 10mm recoil factor-11.2 lbs

G29 recoil factor- 12.5 lbs
Taurus 444 ultralight 4" 44mag (I believe scandium and titanium) recoil factor- 32.7 lbs

__________________
كافر-INFIDEL

"The Marines I have seen around the world have, the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps." Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945
michigan0626 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 05:59 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
michigan0626's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 763
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skullcrusher View Post
I don't know about your loads, but you are talking apples to oranges. A large bore revolver with a long barrel vs. a semi-auto shorter barrel in a smaller load.

I've shot the Raging Bull in .454 Casull with the 8-3/8" barrel and I can tell you that it does not hurt to shoot. It does make the ground shake, but not flinching.

Smaller, lighter guns will give you the recoil that makes one flinch if it hurts to shoot. The Raging Bull with the 8-3/8" barrel in .44 mag should (imo) produce less felt recoil over a 10mm poly. It is a different kind of recoil that you should notice right away.
Raging Bull in 454 with 8-3/8" recoil factor- 35.0 lbs
genitron.com
__________________
كافر-INFIDEL

"The Marines I have seen around the world have, the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps." Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945
michigan0626 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 09:59 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Using the handloads.com recoil calculatorand the above loads, and using a 2.35lb G20 and a 4.1lb Bull, they both end up with around 12-13lbs of recoil energy with the Glock doing it with a significantly higher velocity over the.44 bull. I just wanted to see if anyone had personal experience to validate how id expect the recoil to feel, ya know?

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 03:08 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 93
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michigan0626 View Post
Genitron.com-awesome website

Genitron.com: Details for Taurus 444 Raging Bull .44 Remington Magnum Revolver
Raging Bull 44 MAG recoil factor-15.2 lbs

Genitron.com: Details for Glock 20 10mm Auto Pistol
Glock G20 10mm recoil factor-11.2 lbs

G29 recoil factor- 12.5 lbs
Taurus 444 ultralight 4" 44mag (I believe scandium and titanium) recoil factor- 32.7 lbs
Thanks for that website. It is a really great resource.


__________________
dallascj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
SEARCHED... Taurus Raging Bull users chime in!!! slip Revolver Handguns 43 01-16-2014 01:42 AM
Taurus Raging Bull 44 Mag with 8 in. Bbl Eastex_Guns Sponsor Display 2 12-10-2010 10:55 AM
Front lock on Taurus Raging Bull 444 MB44 Revolver Handguns 8 06-11-2009 12:35 PM
Raging Against Self Defense - A Psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality tracker Politics, Religion and Controversy 12 06-27-2008 01:45 AM