You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion >

New R51


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2016, 01:36 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,638
Liked 1300 Times on 674 Posts
Likes Given: 51

Default New R51

We just got in a couple of the new Remington R-51's. I like the look and feel of the gun, but with the problems of the old ones I hesitate to recommend it to anyone without either shooting it, or getting reliable feedback from those who have.

Anyone here have any experience with the re-designed R-51?
txpossum is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-30-2016, 01:55 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,323
Liked 6318 Times on 4163 Posts
Likes Given: 3241

Default

I have not, but just read a range report in "Gun Tests". Those folks are thorough and no-ads. The link won't work unless you're subscribed, so here is a summary screenshot. The test was done by RK Campbell who is usually on the money.
File Type: jpeg image.jpeg (79.0 KB, 65 views)
Mercator is offline  
Kennydale Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 02:05 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,638
Liked 1300 Times on 674 Posts
Likes Given: 51

Default

Dang. I like it's looks, but an inaccurate pistol is just about worthless., imo.
txpossum is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 02:39 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 15,341
Liked 13224 Times on 6841 Posts
Likes Given: 12806

Default

If someone is buying a pistol for self/home defence, accuracy is of very little concern. As long as it shoots "minute of puke" at 7 yards, you're good to go.
__________________
To the world, you may be only one person. but to one person you may be the world.
locutus is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 03:26 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,823
Liked 407 Times on 320 Posts
Likes Given: 56

Default

Looks like they still have some of the same old issues . Aluminum to steel parts were , brass not supported worth a darn . To many really good choice's in single stack 9mm handguns to mess with Remington .
hardluk1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 03:35 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dallas53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Piney Woods of Central East Texas
Posts: 3,238
Liked 3671 Times on 2126 Posts
Likes Given: 5232

Default

well I have given some thought to buying a smaller single stack 9mm and if they have ironed out the problems, I am giving some thought to checking out the R51. size, weight and capacity look good to me. accuracy for it's intended use are irrelevant.
Dallas53 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 03:45 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 15,341
Liked 13224 Times on 6841 Posts
Likes Given: 12806

Default

Dallas, for a single stack 9MM, check out the little S&W 3913, Ruger LC9S-pro and SIG P239.
__________________
To the world, you may be only one person. but to one person you may be the world.
locutus is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 04:08 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,323
Liked 6318 Times on 4163 Posts
Likes Given: 3241

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
If someone is buying a pistol for self/home defence, accuracy is of very little concern. As long as it shoots "minute of puke" at 7 yards, you're good to go.
Thats true for an emergency, but in practice it should be fun too. Or you won't practice.
Mercator is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 05:32 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dallas53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Piney Woods of Central East Texas
Posts: 3,238
Liked 3671 Times on 2126 Posts
Likes Given: 5232

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
Dallas, for a single stack 9MM, check out the little S&W 3913, Ruger LC9S-pro and SIG P239.
I will. thanks. when I get to the point when I buy one, I am going to check out several different ones. hopefully by the time I get ready to actually buy, there will be some more reviews about the R51 to either consider it, or to ignore it as an option.

I already have a double stack 9mm pistol, and I have a Bersa Thunder 380, so i'm looking at something close in size to the Bersa, but in a 9mm instead. not necessarily a pocket pistol, but something a bit smaller than my current 9mm.
Dallas53 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:23 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,823
Liked 407 Times on 320 Posts
Likes Given: 56

Default

R51 , size weight and capacity ?? Not many that heavy and a single stack . 1911 of course is heavier but most are lighter with the same barrel length and capacity .

Kahr cw9 comes to mind for less money or a shield . Maybe a double stack PT111G2 or M&P9c as its there same weight 12 round cap and the same width give or take a couple TH's .

The r51 still has chamber issues that just not safe .
hardluk1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes