Kel-Tec PF-9: Thoughts and Opinions? - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion > Kel-Tec PF-9: Thoughts and Opinions?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-25-2010, 03:32 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
gatopardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oklahoma City,Oklahoma
Posts: 360
Default Keltec pf9

For cc is very thin, probably the thinnest out there, although I could be wrong ,just check this pic
I carry 6 o'clock in a lefty since there is a natural hollow there, I don't need over sized pants for that.

__________________
Professional phosphorescent pigment for multiple applications.
Water based, non toxic, no flammable, non radioactive, weather and heat resistant.

Visit our website
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE

It works, only if you use it!
Look for me in the vendor display

Last edited by gatopardo; 10-25-2010 at 03:51 PM.
gatopardo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 05:59 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BigByrd47119's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,401
Liked 1102 Times on 677 Posts
Likes Given: 2389

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJAMISON View Post
Have you looked at the Kahr CW9's? I bought one 2 years ago and love the thing. It is a fun range gun and awesome CCW gun. I even carry mine when I have a LEO class but don't want to haul the P229 around. great little 9mm, accurate as heck. Mine out shoots my Sig 229. just the mags are limited to 7 rounds single stack. but i am betting the kel-tec is almost the same.
JJAMISON,

Yep, Kahr CW9 is a great feeling gun although I'v never personally had the oportunity to use one. My problem at the moment, and the reason I'm so interested in this PF-9, is I simply dont have $400+ to spend on a handgun.

Sure the difference might only be around $100, but its simply a chunk of change i dont have (and cant justify spending at the moment).

In the future it might very well be something I consider, although for $400+ I might just get the Glock 26 instead!
__________________

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
---Ron Paul

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it."
---Dr. Martin Luther King

"If you think we are free today, you know nothing about tyranny and even less about freedom."
---Tom Braun

BigByrd47119 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 12:08 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JJAMISON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tuscaloosa,ALABAMA
Posts: 61
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigByrd47119 View Post
JJAMISON,

Yep, Kahr CW9 is a great feeling gun although I'v never personally had the oportunity to use one. My problem at the moment, and the reason I'm so interested in this PF-9, is I simply dont have $400+ to spend on a handgun.

Sure the difference might only be around $100, but its simply a chunk of change i dont have (and cant justify spending at the moment).

In the future it might very well be something I consider, although for $400+ I might just get the Glock 26 instead!
yep that is true. I know what it's like to have to save up. the only reason I bought the Kahr, besides wanting one for 5 years was the deal I got. I bought mine before Obama made it in and i knew the gun shop owner. he sold me the CW9 with an extra mag for $329.00 out the door. NOlw i think they list at over 400. but they shoot really sweet. I out shot my duty pistol with the CW9
__________________
JJAMISON is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
XD 9mm. your thoughts? collegekid20 XD Forum 6 01-05-2010 01:35 PM
thoughts on the new sig... janikphoto Semi-Auto Handguns 4 06-08-2009 09:18 PM
Thoughts on a $599 AR? janikphoto AR-15 Discussion 10 10-07-2008 05:02 PM
thoughts on the PPK? lovetoshoot General Handgun Discussion 13 09-28-2008 04:20 AM
your thoughts dirtysouth The Club House 11 08-03-2008 04:47 PM