You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion >

Break Action Revolver Question

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2016, 09:55 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2
Default Break Action Revolver Question

From what I've read the the higher you go in caliber the quicker a break action revoler's locking bar will wear out. I don't really understand why this is because you can find things like Thompson contenders in .45-70govt and many big game double rifles can come chambered in .375h&h through 700ne, and I haven't read any reviews of their locking bars failing at all. So I'm curios is there a different design being used for contenders/safari rifles or is the mechanism just larger and sturdier but will fail in the same way eventually?

carlakeley is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 01-28-2016, 10:21 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
danf_fl's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 12,361
Liked 4872 Times on 2701 Posts
Likes Given: 2376


Welcome to the forum. Stop by the "Introductions" area and say "Hi".

Now, back to the question.

Companies have done a lot of research to design something. Basically, a break action handgun is the same as the shotgun (O/U or S/S).
The metals used today are better than in earlier years and will probably last longer than you or me. How fast one can get it to break depends on usage and abuse. Most normal shooters will not have a problem.

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)
danf_fl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 11:57 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
c3shooter's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 21,305
Liked 16475 Times on 6791 Posts
Likes Given: 2689


Top break revolvers (Iver Johnson, Harrington & Richardson, etc) were latched closed by a loop or stirrup that hooked over the locking posts. There were designed for low pressure, black powder cartridges. As higher pressure smokeless rounds appeared, the top breaks faded away in favor of the solid frame revolver.

Pistols such as the Contender use a totally different locking system. It is not affected by an unsupported frame stretching. Locks up with a lug on the bottom of the barrel, like a top break rifle. Notice that you will find the old top breaks in .32 S&W, .38 S&W, but not .38 Special, .357 magnum, etc.

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 03:46 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2

Just for clarification with what happens to the stirrup/loop lock. When fired the pressure forces the barrel forward and down away from the hammer causing the post to stretch the stirrup out eventually leading to a gap forming and failure to close issues. That about the size of it?

With contenders/double rifles I'm guessing that there's a rod under the barrel that narrows before bulging out at the end, and the narrow part fits into a notch to hold it in place. That pretty close or am I way off base there?

I'm surprised that a top mounted lock would have more failure issues than a bottom one. I would have thought that mounting the lock over the chamber would have created more stability than mounting it down low closer to the pivot point.
carlakeley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 02:04 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
hiwall's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cleator,AZ
Posts: 4,252
Liked 1339 Times on 862 Posts
Likes Given: 321


The bottom locking mechanism on break action rifles/shotguns are massive compared to the two tiny little fingers sticking up on the break action pistols of a hundred years ago. Also just look at the picture above that C3 posted. See that free standing frame sticking up about an inch and half or two inches? Even very slight movement (stretching, bending) can lead to a none working pistol. Most break action rifles/shotguns are designed to allow for some wear or metal movement and still lock up solid and tight.
Just walking on the edge of of my grave.
hiwall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 10:36 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
locutus's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 16,294
Liked 15472 Times on 7691 Posts
Likes Given: 14577


There was a pretty massive lock up on my old .455 Webley. Soft steel in that era, but it was "bank vault strong" for it's day.

To the world, you may be only one person. but to one person you may be the world.

locutus is online now  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
single action revolver question anselmogarcia1720 Gunsmithing Forum 8 07-03-2014 04:58 PM
U.S. Revolver Co. / Iver Johnson top break question blauder Revolver Handguns 7 05-22-2014 12:46 AM
US Revolver 38 top break lawman3980 Gunsmithing Forum 9 10-08-2012 04:03 AM
More on that top-break revolver........ Bob Wright Revolver Handguns 2 05-28-2008 05:35 PM
Top Break revolver? Bob Wright Revolver Handguns 10 05-27-2008 04:39 PM