Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   General Handgun Discussion (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f14/)
-   -   .45 vs. 9mm (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f14/45-vs-9mm-1552/)

notdku 08-05-2007 07:49 PM

.45 vs. 9mm
 
For CCW purposes which caliber do you prefer and why?

Don Lu 08-05-2007 10:33 PM

I dont own any .45's yet.... but I'd probably prefer a high capacity .45 like an xd. If i didnt have a hi-cap .45, I definatley choose the capacity of a 9mm like glock over a 1911 type pistol.

Jay 08-05-2007 10:51 PM

My own personal preference.......

I've carried a 1911-type handgun for many years. I'm proficient with it, and I'm not as concerned with over-penetration as I am with the 9mm. Therefore, that's what I carry. Bullet type has a bearing on any handgun used for personal protection, and there is a plus and minus side to any caliber discussion. In my opinion, the deciding factor should be proficiency. The other alternatives, or trade-offs can be a factor, but a hit with a .22 beats miss with a .45 any day.

Just my 2 cents worth...... :)

FALPhil 08-06-2007 11:58 AM

Both, depending on circumstance. Generally, I prefer my lightweight Kimber Officer's in 45ACP. Once in a while, I need something a little thinner, so I carry a customized Star BM, and sometimes I carry my CZ75 Compact for the sheer joy of it. All of them have the same kinds of controls in the same relative positions and can be carried cocked and locked.

pioneer461 08-06-2007 03:20 PM

I've seen and heard about too many fialures to stop with 9mm. Granted, shot placement is everything, but is not something we can count on in combat. It's one thing to place 15 rounds in a 5" circle at 25 yards, but it is quite another to hit anything with someone shoot'n back, regardless of caliber. The .45acp is a combat proven round, and when dealing in micro-seconds and fractions of an inch, I'll take a bigger bullet.

FALPhil 08-06-2007 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pioneer461 (Post 5796)
I've seen and heard about too many fialures to stop with 9mm. Granted, shot placement is everything, but is not something we can count on in combat. It's one thing to place 15 rounds in a 5" circle at 25 yards, but it is quite another to hit anything with someone shoot'n back, regardless of caliber. The .45acp is a combat proven round, and when dealing in micro-seconds and fractions of an inch, I'll take a bigger bullet.

I'm with you - 45 is tops. But the 9mm Para is a combat proven round, too, and more people have been killed with it that 45ACP. It is probably the longest used military handgun cartridge in the world.

Gearguy10 08-07-2007 01:43 AM

If weight wasn't a factor, I'd go .45. For concealed carry though a fully loaded .45 like an XD can be HEAVY. There are plenty of lightweight little 9mm out there for tucking in a pocket.

Etho 08-07-2007 05:42 AM

I carry a 1911 chambered in .45 acp but I certainly would never feel undergunned with a 9mm.

Whichever someone shoots best is my opinion, but .32, .25 and .22 I do not find to be very accepted concealed carry calibers. .380 at a minimum.

RMTactical 08-15-2007 07:56 PM

9mm

Good power with +p loads, good capacity, smaller gun, less recoil, and the number one reason is...

I can afford to shoot more, therefore increasing my skill and training and making me able to make the shots that matter, as shot placement is the most important factor in a shootout.

1984cj 08-15-2007 09:41 PM

OMG! I can't believe that you asked this question!
Why not ask which is better Glock or 1911?
Just Kidding......
Either caliber is good. It is all in shot placement.
However, 9mm may expand but a .45 wont shrink.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.