1st pistol advice - Sig, FNX, XD(M)...
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > General Handgun Discussion > 1st pistol advice - Sig, FNX, XD(M)...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2013, 08:04 PM   #1
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it.
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
KJG67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,430
Liked 996 Times on 509 Posts
Likes Given: 708

Default 1st pistol advice - Sig, FNX, XD(M)...

Hi all - newbie and really enjoy the forums here. I've been shooting .22 rifles, trap/skeet on and off for years, but am a newbie in the grand scheme of things. I've recently taken two pistol courses and have been going to the range regularly to practice and rent several pistols. My use is basically recreational, maybe do some local competition stuff down the road if/when I become proficient. I'm looking at 9mm at this point for price and practice, and will eventually add .45 as an option for CC. Of course I live in Illinios, so I may end up with my index finger and thumb for home defense shortly.

So far I've shot Sig, S&W, Ruger, FN, and Springfield in 9 and 40. By far, the Sig 226 base model fit my hand like a glove and shot like an extension of my body. The FNX and XD(M) were close contenders. Grips were pretty comfortable and shot placement at various distances were acceptable. The S&W M&P9 felt like the Sig in my hand, but I wasn't crazy about the trigger. Ruger SR9 was nice as well. Last tidbit - I'm lefty. I've adapted and am comfortable with the Sig and XD(M).

I think I have my decision down to the following 3-4 guns. Only negative to the Sig is obviously the price. I can do it, but wanted some opinions before laying out that kind of dough. Will probably end up installing trijicon sights.

226 Nitron or MK-25 9mm
FNX-9
XD(M) 4.5" 9mm

Thanks for any advice you can offer. Fortunately there are two ranges in the area where I can rent most popular models.

__________________
KJG67 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 01-06-2013, 08:45 PM   #2
FAA licensed bugsmasher
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Davenport,IA
Posts: 6,786
Liked 2150 Times on 1169 Posts
Likes Given: 777

Default

Any of the guns you mentioned are fine pieces of machinery. You can't go wrong with any of them. Much of selecting handguns simply comes down to what feels right to you.

__________________

Scott

Quote:
If you're not representing Jesus in a way that makes people want to hang out with you, you're doing it wrong.
Quote:
Those who refuse to participate in politics shall be governed by their inferiors. -Plato
Regent Holdings What you need to know about silver, gold, and the economy.

Join the NRA
ScottA is online now  
danf_fl Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 03:09 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 173
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts

Default

All of those are great, and you will get a quality gun with any of them. It sounds like at this point you should go with what shoots best in your hands and feels good. My brother didn't even look at glocks when he wanted a gun initially because he didn't want to be part of "the group". After he shot many other guns he finally decided to try one, and then took it home cause he felt more accurate and comfortable with it. So if you've got one that feels good and shoots good, that that's the one i would get. My sister did the same thing and ended up with a bersa.

__________________
kalboy26 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 03:19 AM   #4
FAA licensed bugsmasher
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Davenport,IA
Posts: 6,786
Liked 2150 Times on 1169 Posts
Likes Given: 777

Default

Friends don't let friends shoot Glocks.

__________________

Scott

Quote:
If you're not representing Jesus in a way that makes people want to hang out with you, you're doing it wrong.
Quote:
Those who refuse to participate in politics shall be governed by their inferiors. -Plato
Regent Holdings What you need to know about silver, gold, and the economy.

Join the NRA
ScottA is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:00 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9204 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

1911 for the win.

__________________
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:03 AM   #6
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it.
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
KJG67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,430
Liked 996 Times on 509 Posts
Likes Given: 708

Default

Thanks guys Sorry I left Glock off there, but did shoot a 17. It was OK. Wasn't bad, wasn't impressive in my hands. I know there's so many manufacturers to look at. My two ranges don't rent Bersa, so I can't test a Thunder HC Pro.

I didn't think I was going to hear anything bad about these choices as I did some research, but wanted to see if anything jumped out at you experienced guys and gals. I love the Sig but the more I consider this all other things being equal, I may go with the FN or XD(M), and then spend the other half of the money on a compact or subcompact.

And in case anyone didn't hear, we beat the idiots in Springfield (Illinois politicians) (for now). No weapons ban passed today.

__________________

Last edited by KJG67; 01-07-2013 at 04:09 AM.
KJG67 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:08 AM   #7
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it.
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
KJG67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,430
Liked 996 Times on 509 Posts
Likes Given: 708

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trip286 View Post
1911 for the win.
Someday! I'm not confident enough yet to be carrying around cocked and locked. I know there are safety's in place, but I'm just not there yet with experience.
__________________
KJG67 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:23 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9204 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJG67 View Post
Someday! I'm not confident enough yet to be carrying around cocked and locked. I know there are safety's in place, but I'm just not there yet with experience.
You would likely be incredibly surprised. Once you take apart a 1911, and study the parts and how they interact, you'll never have any but the utmost confidence in cocked and locked carry with a 1911.

Maybe I'm just drinking too much of the KoolAid, but I sincerely believe that perfection was achieved approximately 103 years ago. IMO, the only thing that holds a candle to it, is the Browning High Power, which JMB has reportedly said he personally felt was an improvement over the 1911. But it's a 9mm...
__________________
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:42 AM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,685
Liked 1099 Times on 607 Posts
Likes Given: 459

Default

I would recommend getting a Glock 17 or 19 9MM pistol for your first practice and carry piece.

I can think of no reason to use .45 ACP for carry if you are not restricted by magazine capacity. If you are restricted by magazine capacity, get a Glock 26. When you are by yourself in public, don't have spare magazines laying around as you may in your own house, and have only what you're carrying to end any potentially life threatening encounter with a criminal, having more rounds and not less is generally a better idea. Anyone who shoots .45 ACP well can shoot 9MM just as well and faster because there's less recoil to contend with.

Despite the comments about Glocks, there's no finer general purpose use combat handgun made. I would take a 9MM Glock over a Colt M1911 any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I own both and shoot both. I've never personally owned a Colt M1911 (2 series 80 guns that I sold and 1 series 70 that I still own) that made it to 5K rounds before a major parts failure of some kind.

The extractor failed on my series 70 in fewer than 500 rounds. I keep replacement parts on hand and it was not the end of the world, but it doesn't exactly inspire confidence. The failures with the series 80 guns were more serious (front sight fell off one and the other had a barrel bushing fail). None of the failures were catastrophic, I just had to purchase and install replacement parts. Any gun can malfunction, but Glocks generally malfunction less than other types of guns and have fewer major parts failures.

You can pay between 2K to 3K to purchase a M1911 that's as reliable as a Glock, or you can pay $500 for a Glock, $100 for extra magazines, $100 on a quality holster, $200 for a SureFire X300, and then spend the rest on cheaper 9MM ammo to practice with.

Whichever platform you decide to go with, buy something that is striker-fired (Glock series, S&W M&P series, Caracal, Arsenal Firearms Strike One) and don't modify it without a lot of thought and good reason. Hammer-fired guns are old technology. The Glock has three safeties and you don't have to manually disengage any of them to fire the gun.

The M1911-A1 is single-action only and has an external safety lever and grip safety lever that must both be actuated to fire the gun. Glocks have only required controls on them (trigger and slide release). Interestingly enough, the M1911 as John Moses Browning designed it did not have an external safety. The US Army made it a requirement.

I would view any .45 ACP pistol or .357 Magnum revolver as a home defense weapon and a 9MM pistol as a concealed carry weapon.

With modern hollowpoint ammunition, there's no relevant difference in wound channel between 9MM and .45 ACP. It makes sense for the military to use .45 ACP because of the artificial requirement to not use hollowpoint ammunition. We civilians don't have that asinine ammunition design detail to contend with.

__________________

Last edited by kbd512; 01-07-2013 at 04:52 AM.
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 04:51 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
1911love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,474
Liked 638 Times on 385 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Kbd is right about 9mm. I load in my G19 for CC 124gr +p Speer Gold Dot bonded JHPs. They scream out of the barrel at 1450fps. That's almost as fast as a .357 magnum. It's all about shot placement IMO. Also, check out the new Sig M11-A1. See if anyone teaches a basic CC course in your area that offers many diff guns to run scenarios with. If they have lots of "trial" guns in the class, they will also have lots of "trial" holsters too. This will save lots of time and money trying to figure out what works best for you.

__________________
1911love is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Just inherited Remington .380 pistol and Colt .32 pistol.....Info Please AdkFlight Semi-Auto Handguns 7 10-02-2012 07:27 PM
Compare functionality, etc of Mossberg 500 with pistol grip vs pistol grip with ext fastline General Shotgun Discussion 1 01-31-2011 02:21 AM
What is considered a large pistol verses a small pistol for primers? BAMonty Ammunition & Reloading 9 06-27-2010 09:12 AM
Question About Turbiaux Le Protector, Minneapolis Palm Pistol, Ames Palm Pistol CarolynB General Handgun Discussion 0 01-03-2009 02:16 AM
Pistol nervousness/Pistol fun! painted_klown General Handgun Discussion 11 09-02-2008 10:50 AM