Ask NRA/ILA to Stay Home Next Year
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Events and Meetups > State Forums > Missouri Gun Forum > Ask NRA/ILA to Stay Home Next Year

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2012, 06:39 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Plains,Missouri
Posts: 74
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default Ask NRA/ILA to Stay Home Next Year

Given the damage NRA/ILA rep Whitney O'Neil seems set upon doing in Missouri, I can only hope he stays in Fairfax next year.

From the most recent NRA/ILA Alert:

Quote:
House Bill 1647, authored by state Representative Jeanie Riddle (R-20) and shepherded through the Senate by state Senator Mike Kehoe (R-6), has been amended in the Senate to include important Right-to-Carry reforms. If enacted, this bill would lower the Right-to-Carry age from 21 to 18 for active duty military stationed in Missouri, remove the penalty for accidental exposure of a concealed firearm by persons who have a right-to-carry permit, establish gun rights restoration for those who are currently prohibited from restoring their Second Amendment rights, and provide a relief-from-disabilities process allowing an individual to get his or her firearm rights restored. Additionally, this legislation would legalize auto-opening knife ownership.
What's wrong with that? So far as anyone's experienced to date, after eight years of legal CCW, there is no penalty for accidental exposure. At least, not until Mr. O'Neil came in and made an issue of it. Now that he and his organization have raised the possibility there will undoubtedly be some prosecutor(s) who will try to bring such charges. Of course, what that's covering over is that the bill was originally written to protect open carry in general until NRA/ILA convinced a legislator to reduce the protection to accidental exposure. So, NRA/ILA rep Whitney O'Neil managed, to the unanimous objection of all grassroots lobbyists, to not only get the original intent gutted but added a specious risk that hadn't previously existed. Such a deal!

Last year he was responsible for a "correction" in Missouri law to increase the CCW training requirements to a minimum of 140rds. fired on the range, a minimum of 70 from both a pistol and a revolver, claiming it was a "clarification" of existing law. Over the preceding seven years, only a few instructors, most of whom also sold ammo and rented firearms to students, had interpreted the law in such a manner. Again, there was no demonstrated problem insofar as the lesser training requirement leading to mishaps; just the NRA coming in and "correcting" what didn't need to be corrected. Now, the NRA, in another alert, is pushing for passage of HR489 which grandfathers training certificates issued under the old law, a problem that wouldn't need correction if NRA/ILA hadn't decided that they know better than the grassroots people who'd originally written and passed our CCW law.

Unfortunately, NRA/ILA doesn't seem to have any interest in or reason to listen to grassroots. They send their rep, Whitney O'Neil, into the state to follow the Fairfax party line and be damned what the state residents want. It reminds me of a labor union I once was forced to join whose business agent was selling us out. We learned that we couldn't get rid of him; he was hired by the national and only they could fire him. In that case, we voted to go non-union. I don't think we have that option with the NRA/ILA.
__________________
brolin_1911a1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-18-2012, 07:01 PM   #2
fmj
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fmj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne,IN
Posts: 3,454
Liked 753 Times on 437 Posts
Likes Given: 306

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brolin_1911a1 View Post
Given the damage NRA/ILA rep Whitney O'Neil seems set upon doing in Missouri, I can only hope he stays in Fairfax next year.

From the most recent NRA/ILA Alert:
What's wrong with that? So far as anyone's experienced to date, after eight years of legal CCW, there is no penalty for accidental exposure. At least, not until Mr. O'Neil came in and made an issue of it. Now that he and his organization have raised the possibility there will undoubtedly be some prosecutor(s) who will try to bring such charges. Of course, what that's covering over is that the bill was originally written to protect open carry in general until NRA/ILA convinced a legislator to reduce the protection to accidental exposure. So, NRA/ILA rep Whitney O'Neil managed, to the unanimous objection of all grassroots lobbyists, to not only get the original intent gutted but added a specious risk that hadn't previously existed. Such a deal!

Last year he was responsible for a "correction" in Missouri law to increase the CCW training requirements to a minimum of 140rds. fired on the range, a minimum of 70 from both a pistol and a revolver, claiming it was a "clarification" of existing law. Over the preceding seven years, only a few instructors, most of whom also sold ammo and rented firearms to students, had interpreted the law in such a manner. Again, there was no demonstrated problem insofar as the lesser training requirement leading to mishaps; just the NRA coming in and "correcting" what didn't need to be corrected. Now, the NRA, in another alert, is pushing for passage of HR489 which grandfathers training certificates issued under the old law, a problem that wouldn't need correction if NRA/ILA hadn't decided that they know better than the grassroots people who'd originally written and passed our CCW law.

Unfortunately, NRA/ILA doesn't seem to have any interest in or reason to listen to grassroots. They send their rep, Whitney O'Neil, into the state to follow the Fairfax party line and be damned what the state residents want. It reminds me of a labor union I once was forced to join whose business agent was selling us out. We learned that we couldn't get rid of him; he was hired by the national and only they could fire him. In that case, we voted to go non-union. I don't think we have that option with the NRA/ILA.
3 Words....


4 if you want to be technical




GUN OWNERSof AMERICA
__________________
"Those that would trade essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjammin Franklin

The 1911: Turning useless trash into good fertilizer for over 100 years!!
fmj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
14 Year Old NC Boy Kills Home Invader alsaqr Legal and Activism 19 01-10-2012 10:24 PM
Very Afraidí: 66-Year-Old Woman Shoots and Kills Home Intruder towboater The Club House 12 10-25-2011 05:05 AM
11 year old girl defends home with Pink rifle wldennis The Club House 11 12-18-2010 07:35 PM
Stay Alert and Stay Alive out there... cpttango30 The Club House 10 08-15-2010 03:18 AM
SWAT officers invade home, take 11-year-old at gunpoint sculker The Club House 6 01-08-2008 01:24 AM