overview of Mississippi's new open carry law - Page 4
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Events and Meetups > State Forums > Mississippi Gun Forum > overview of Mississippi's new open carry law

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-2013, 08:46 PM   #31
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Scratchammo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Memphis,The volunteer state
Posts: 1,466
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 159

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The1Monster View Post
She is. Contact a lawyer.
I just got off the phone with with DA's office, she says I can. Seems though that it'd be troublesome depending on how informed a cop might be about it. Still, I didn't get a G21 to sit in the safe.
__________________

"THE SIERRA JUST HOTEL TANGO FOXTROT -OVER"

MALO PERICULOSAM LIBERTATEM QUAM QUIETUM SERVITIUM

Scratchammo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2013, 08:58 PM   #32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratchammo View Post
I just called the Bateville Highway Patrol Office to verify whether or not if it's ok to open carry with a permit, she said no. Is she misinformed or am I?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratchammo View Post
I just got off the phone with with DA's office, she says I can. Seems though that it'd be troublesome depending on how informed a cop might be about it. Still, I didn't get a G21 to sit in the safe.
Given that article about Desoto and Tate County Sheriff's going ahead with OC, it sounds like your little corner of MS, at least, is ready to go ahead.

I don't know if I would start with that G21; they might confiscate it in error and then not be able to figure out which one was yours and which was theirs.


I still think I will get a western rig and carry my black powder revolver sometimes.
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
Scratchammo Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2013, 09:21 PM   #33
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 33
Liked 26 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Unfortunately many cops simply don't know (all) the laws they're tasked with enforcing. Sometimes this is a failing on them or their department, sometimes they allow personal opinion to get in the way (I think that should be illegal, so it must be!), but usually it's the simple fact that there are so many laws on the books that it's impossible to know them all. Even lawyers, who's job sometimes means life or death, quite literally, for a client, use massive volumes of reference materials, assistants, and request opinions, help, and pick the minds other lawyers on legal matters where they may have more experience. This is also why you have family law attorneys, real estate attorneys, criminal law attorneys, personal injury attorneys, divorce attorneys (not always falling into the family law category), and so on. To expect any one single cop to know all the laws of their jurisdiction would just not be fair. But then...I could go on for days about how they should be able to and the real problem is that we're all over regulated and over legislated.

Kudos for double checking with the DA. Bear in mind, that would be the one to press charges against you on the public's behalf if you walk the wrong side of the line, so having their opinion is a damn good idea.

With such a hot topic current event for your state though, you would think she'd (at the highway patrol) have already been informed. That would just be responsibly prudent.

__________________
The1Monster is offline  
Scratchammo Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2013, 10:05 PM   #34
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 859
Liked 276 Times on 189 Posts
Likes Given: 32

Default

It got blocked, again.

__________________
Gizord1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2013, 03:36 AM   #35
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Scratchammo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Memphis,The volunteer state
Posts: 1,466
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 159

Default

Hopefully I'm not going too far off topic by asking, are we allowed a backup? How many is one allowed on his person?

__________________

"THE SIERRA JUST HOTEL TANGO FOXTROT -OVER"

MALO PERICULOSAM LIBERTATEM QUAM QUIETUM SERVITIUM

Scratchammo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2013, 09:39 AM   #36
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 859
Liked 276 Times on 189 Posts
Likes Given: 32

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratchammo
Hopefully I'm not going too far off topic by asking, are we allowed a backup? How many is one allowed on his person?
I wondered the same thing
__________________
Gizord1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2013, 04:19 PM   #37
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ellis36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Batesville,Mississippi
Posts: 845
Liked 670 Times on 312 Posts
Likes Given: 390

Default

This link takes you to the full ruling. It’s in pdf, but below is the ‘reasoning’ behind the ‘vague, confusing and overbroad’
charge.

You would think its a case of searching for excuses to justify a foregone decision.

ellis

http://localtvwreg.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/click-here-to-read-the-full-ruling.pdf

screen-shot-2013-07-14-11.03.54-am.jpg   screen-shot-2013-07-14-11.04.27-am.jpg  
__________________
ellis36 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2013, 07:12 PM   #38
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/22859168/attorney-general-says-gun-ruling-not-statewide


Quote:
JACKSON, MS (Mississippi News Now) -
Attorney General Jim Hoods says he doesn't believe Hinds County Circuit Judge Winston Kidd's ruling on the open carry law applies statewide.
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
Scratchammo Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 08:57 PM   #39
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ellis36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Batesville,Mississippi
Posts: 845
Liked 670 Times on 312 Posts
Likes Given: 390

Default

The status of the Mississippi ‘open carry’ law as of August 8, 2013. For those not familiar with Mississippi counties, Hinds county is the county that the city of Jackson is in.

ellis

http://www.mississippigunnews.com/ms-open-carry-law-is-now-in-the-hands-of-the-state-supreme-court/

MS “open carry” law is now in the hands of the State Supreme Court

August 8, 2013 - By Dana, Laws and Legislation -

Now we wait

Attorney Lisa Mishune Ross who represents DA Robert Shuler Smith and the handful of Hinds County Constables who have been “confused” by House Bill 2, filed a rambling and mostly irrelevant brief with the MS Supreme Court supporting Judge Winston Kidd’s injunction against House Bill 2. After reading her brief I am concerned that we are left completely uninformed of Ms Ross’ stand on dueling.

Ms Ross proposes to address three issues in her brief:
A. Whether the phrase “called not be called into question” [ I believe she means "shall not be called into question"] means the Mississippi Legislature cannot place reasonable restrictions, consistent with public safety and Article 3, § 12, on the right to keep and bear arms in public?

B. Whether House Bill 2 is unconstitutionally vague on its face as a matter of law? .

C. Whether Judge Kidd violated the Separation of Powers Doctrine?

Ms Ross begins her argument with the MS Constitution Article 3, Section 12;
“[T] he right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in the aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called into question, but the legislature may regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons.”

She spends a great deal of time on the phrase “shall not be called into question” and attempts to make a point that this phrase does not limit the government from placing “reasonable limitations consistent with public safety on the right to keep and bear arms.” She continues further to site several court cases where the U.S. Supreme Court has issued opinions supporting governments ability to impose limitations on the “right to keep and bear arms” Her point seems to be that she and her clients are distraught because House Bill 2 did not outline limitations on citizens right to keep and bear arms.

They and Judge Kidd want the Legislature to outline in the bill who can and can not carry weapons openly. The problem with this is that House Bill 2 does not address open carry of weapons, it simply defines “concealed”. Other laws address the issue of who can and can not carry a weapon.

The second point in Ms Ross’ brief is her attempt to show that House Bill 2 is “unconstitutionally vague”. Her first point on this matter is a claim that there has been confusion among the population on House Bill 2. She quotes Attorney General Hood in an interview where he stated, there has been, “quite a bit of confusion” about House Bill 2. The problem with that is Judge Kidd, Ms Ross and her clients are the source of that confusion. This I believe has been their tactic all along. They spread ideas about House Bill 2 that they know are false and cry on TV about how confused they are, then go to court and claim the bill is confusing.

She goes on to propose that House Bill 2 is vague when it states that a weapon is not concealed if the “pistol carried upon the person in a sheath, belt holster or shoulder holster that is wholly or partially visible.” Ms Ross states that she believes this is confusing because she can not determine if this applies to the pistol or the holster being “wholly or partially visible”, although she does not seem to have any problem understanding the old definition that reads “wholly or partially concealed”. In her argument she is taking one phrase out of context and then claiming it is not clear.

The entire section she is referring too states:

For the purposes of this section, “concealed” means hidden or obscured from common observation and shall not include any weapon listed in subsection (1) of this section, including, but not limited to, a loaded or unloaded pistol carried upon the person in a sheath, belt holster or shoulder holster that is wholly or partially visible, or carried upon the person in a scabbard or case for carrying the weapon that is wholly or partially visible.

I am not an english teacher but when I read this definition in context of the entire bill it is apparent to me that “wholly or partially visible” is referring to the weapon. I’ve been told that the subject of this sentence is “weapon” so it is reasonable to assume and grammatically correct to assume “wholly or partially visible” is referring to the weapon.

Ms Ross ends her brief with a defense of Judge Kidd’s actions and counters the claim that he has violated the separation of powers principle. In her defense she list several past opinions of the Court that emphasis the importance the Court places on judicial independence. She argues that the judicial branch has the authority to “say what the law is” and that is what Judge Kidd has done. But it seems to me that Judge Kidd did not say what the law is but rather stated what he wants to law to be. He told the Legislature that he did not like the law they passed and insist that they change it to meet his qualifications.

My question is, If Judge Kidd’s ruling is upheld by the Supreme Court, does the Legislature need to ask Judge Kidd if any revision to House Bill 2 is acceptable to him before anything is passed next legislative session?

__________________
ellis36 is offline  
orangello Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 09:09 PM   #40
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

http://www.wtva.com/news/local/story/Mississippi-Supreme-Court-upholds-Open-Carry-Law/6YlcKoBGSkaABk_YEH0Rnw.cspx

Trip286 posted up a link to this. It seems like it is the "real deal" now.

I wonder where I can get a tactical thigh rig for a NAA .22LR mini-revolver.
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
why open carry???? freetobefree Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 14 12-20-2012 01:38 PM
Difference between open carry and concealed carry ineverFTF Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 8 08-31-2012 06:11 PM
Open carry or not partdeux General Handgun Discussion 37 10-07-2011 11:51 PM
Would you open carry if you could? michiana Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 179 07-27-2010 03:24 AM
Open Carry vs. Concealed Carry Debate Tony Soprano The Club House 31 08-06-2009 04:23 AM