Teen suing over FOID Card denial
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Events and Meetups > State Forums > Illinois Gun Forum >

Teen suing over FOID Card denial


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2013, 02:44 AM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
KJG67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,428
Liked 996 Times on 509 Posts
Likes Given: 708

Default Teen suing over FOID Card denial

http://madisonrecord.com/news/258118-teen-suing-over-foid-card-denial-seeks-summary-judgment?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_ca mpaign=eaknef_gmail_com

Some highlights, but click the link to read the full story. Gotta love the the closing argument. Let's see Princess Lisa get herself out of this one.

...
An 18-year-old suing over the denial of her Firearm Owners Identification (FOID) Card application has asked a federal judge to grant her summary judgment.

Filed last month, Tempest Horsley’s motion for summary judgment also seeks a court order deeming the provision of the FOID Card Act that requires 18, 19 and 20-year-olds to obtain written consent from their parents as unconstitutional.

In addition, Horsley wants the court to direct Jessica Trame, chief of the Illinois State Police’s Firearms Services Bureau, to process her FOID Card application and issue her a valid card within 30 days, as well as award her court costs and attorney fees.

Represented by Wood River attorney Thomas Maag, Horsley sued Trame in April in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois after her FOID Card application was denied because her parents refused to provide their written consent.

In her suit, Horsley asserts that she sought a FOID card so she could obtain a double-barrel shotgun “pursuant to the suggestion of Vice President Joe Biden,” who said in February 2013 that “if you want to protect yourself, get a double-barreled shotgun.”

Horsley contends that the act’s parental consent requirement for those under 21 seeking a FOID Card violates her constitutional rights to possess a firearm for self-defense under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.
Trame, who was sued in her official capacity and is represented by the Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office, asked a federal judge in June to dismiss Horsley’s suit...

...In her motion, Horsley repeats many of the same arguments she made in previous court filings, including one that stems from the 1976 ruling in Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth.

The court in that case struck down a portion of a Missouri law that required minors and married women to obtain parental or spousal consent in order to get an abortion.

Horsley asserts that if she was 17, one year younger than she currently is, and pregnant, the state could not require her to obtain parental consent to get an abortion, but “[y]et, this blanket parental consent requirement … is being imposed on 18 year olds seeking to own plain ordinary firearms.”

“For this Court to sustain the challenged requirement in this case,” Horsley contends, “this Court will be obliged to find Plaintiff’s Second Amendment rights to be inferior to her abortion rights.”


__________________
.
I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information.
- Bill Watterson, "Calvin", It's a Magical World
KJG67 is offline  
divinginn Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-14-2013, 03:23 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,716
Liked 3733 Times on 2287 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJG67
For this Court to sustain the challenged requirement in this case,” Horsley contends, “this Court will be obliged to find Plaintiff’s Second Amendment rights to be inferior to her abortion rights.”
Wow. That's an interesting take on it. I like her reasoning.


__________________
Always have clean socks.
JW357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 05:42 AM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,270
Liked 6821 Times on 3624 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

Kinda misses the point that the whole foid card thing is extremely unconstitutional to begin with
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is offline  
DrumJunkie Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 06:20 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DrumJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Here in the holler....
Posts: 4,823
Liked 1617 Times on 945 Posts
Likes Given: 1894

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
Kinda misses the point that the whole foid card thing is extremely unconstitutional to begin with
True, but I do like the idea of trying to stick it to the man in that state while using their own messiahs second banana to shove it a little deeper.
__________________
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
DrumJunkie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 06:48 AM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,716
Liked 3733 Times on 2287 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM
Kinda misses the point that the whole foid card thing is extremely unconstitutional to begin with
Yes, but you have to win however you can. Saying the FOID card is against the 2nd Amendment likely won't get them far.
__________________
Always have clean socks.
JW357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 01:40 AM   #6
CGS
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago Illinois area
Posts: 399
Liked 66 Times on 52 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
Kinda misses the point that the whole foid card thing is extremely unconstitutional to begin with
+1


Yes on the surface, I have no problem with FOID, until you learn how jacked up it really is and how it's not about public safety but is about restriction. If it was what "they" say it is, ok fine. But it's not. It's a hindrance to the leagl gun owner. I'm not sure how it hasn't been knocked down by SCOTUS, but I know a few other states have similiar and even more restrictive.


__________________
-Thomas
NRA Life Member, ISRA Member, American Gunsmith Institute Certified, NRA Instructor, State of IL authorized Carry Concealed Instructor [url]
CGS is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
FOID CARD - 57 day wait? VXASUXV Legal and Activism 55 03-28-2013 12:38 PM
foid card JolietGunner General Handgun Discussion 3 03-16-2013 02:50 PM
IL FOID card question bikerlbf406 Legal and Activism 19 10-28-2012 01:43 PM
FOID Card Requirement Armadiloroadkil Illinois Gun Forum 11 09-18-2012 12:42 AM
The FOID card thesoulution22 Legal and Activism 41 09-09-2012 01:12 AM



Newest Threads