Wmd


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > Wmd

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2009, 07:54 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
McNabb11b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ft. Campbell,Over there
Posts: 523
Default Wmd

I have heard people use weapons of mass destruction as an argument for gun control. It seems like it is a stupid unfair argument, but I can't place my finger on exactly why. Any thoughts?



__________________
"Dread Naught"

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud in "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"

"My dear boy, I love hearing my relations abused. It is the only thing that makes me put up with them at all. Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die."
McNabb11b is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-26-2009, 08:05 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
iloveguns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 813
Default

I guess if you could find a gun that held thousands and thousands of rounds and when you pulled the trigger it wiped out thousands in an instant , then you could call a gun that?



__________________
iloveguns is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 08:27 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
McNabb11b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ft. Campbell,Over there
Posts: 523
Default

Technically it is a weapon, or Arms, so the argument is that those who oppose gun control based on the Constitution also support people being able to obtain nuclear weapons.

__________________
"Dread Naught"

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud in "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"

"My dear boy, I love hearing my relations abused. It is the only thing that makes me put up with them at all. Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die."
McNabb11b is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 10:05 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mpd8488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 245
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Well you can argue it within the intent of the second amendment. We have the right to own small arms because we can use them to protect ourselves from criminals, our government, and other governments. A nuclear weapon or other WMD does not really serve that purpose because it is far more destructive. You can't lob a nuke anywhere in the U.S. because you will end up killing civilians. can't lob a nuke at a foreign country because in all likelyhood the citizens of that country are not our true enemies and it will simply result in the destruction of the U.S. Furthemore, the storage and upkeep of nuclear weapons (safe ones, that is) requires special facilities and a lot of personel. No individual or his family is really capable of storing, maintaining, and most importantly securing most WMDs.

In reality nobody is ever asking that question to be serious. It is an indicator that you are winning the argument and your opponent is trying to move the discussion to something else entirely to make you look like an extremist. In this case try to maintain your advantage by asking questions. Don't spout facts at them, that doesn't work. Only ask them questions, especially ones that can't be answered with Brady Bunch talking points. Eventually this will frustrate an unprepared opponent and they will resort to name calling, which means you just won the debate. The point isn't to convince your opponent, it is to convince any onlookers that we hold the legal, moral, and empirical high ground.

__________________
mpd8488 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 10:12 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
McNabb11b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ft. Campbell,Over there
Posts: 523
Default

Where would that line be drawn on small arms?

__________________
"Dread Naught"

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud in "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"

"My dear boy, I love hearing my relations abused. It is the only thing that makes me put up with them at all. Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die."
McNabb11b is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 10:13 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
McNabb11b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ft. Campbell,Over there
Posts: 523
Default

Thanks for your input by the way. I guess that what was forgotten was the intended purpose of the second amendment.

__________________
"Dread Naught"

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud in "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"

"My dear boy, I love hearing my relations abused. It is the only thing that makes me put up with them at all. Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die."
McNabb11b is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 10:24 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mpd8488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 245
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McNabb11b View Post
Where would that line be drawn on small arms?
There's a question for the ages.

Well according to some we should only be allowed to have weapons that were available in 1787. According to most, the status quo of everything short of full autos is okay. According to me, artillery should be legal
__________________
mpd8488 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 10:27 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
McNabb11b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ft. Campbell,Over there
Posts: 523
Default

I agree, only weapons that would only hit their intended target, If the user has half a brain that is.

__________________
"Dread Naught"

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud in "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"

"My dear boy, I love hearing my relations abused. It is the only thing that makes me put up with them at all. Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die."
McNabb11b is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 11:02 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mrm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,382
Liked 311 Times on 207 Posts
Likes Given: 27

Default Atomic Annie

Quote:
Originally Posted by McNabb11b View Post
Where would that line be drawn on small arms?
I think Atomic Annie also known as M65 Atomic Cannon would be the smallest gun, actually a 280mm cannon, that as a "Gun" could be considered a WMD. It was developed in 1950, test fired in Nevada in 1953 with a 15 kilo ton yeild, and fielded by the end of 1953 in the European and Korean theaters. It weighed 83.3 tons including cartridge weight, took 5 to 7 men to operate and had a max. range of 20 miles. With the improvements of rocket delivery systems and submarines it very soon became impractical and a bit silly. Annie was retired from service in 1963.
__________________
mrm14 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 04:16 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 9,639
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts

Default

I think we should be allowed nukes, for sporting purposes, of course.

Unfortunately, the two that qualify for C&R were left in Japan.



__________________
Benning Boy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes