"No One But the Authorities Should Have 'Assault Weapons'"
If these people had "assault weapons," they would probably (check all that apply):
___ rob liquor stores
___ engage in drive-by shootings
___ leave them lying around where their kids could find them
___ blow away motorists during traffic disputes
___ go on schoolyard rampages
___ accidentally kill friends and family members
___ none of the above
Might there be a moral, historically justified need for "non-sporting" arms in the hands of "average citizens"? The next time someone tells you we need to ban "assault weapons," ask them to take this test. Why not send a copy of it to the politicians who represent you and see how they answer?
Gun Rights Examiner: Test your knowledge of 'gun control'