[primer1]

Originally Posted by ScottA

I'm starting to get tweezer brain from watching you guys twist each others' words. Please keep the discussion honest.

So you think lapd was using tweezers to alter the cops brains to make them racists? Hmmm, interesting.

Originally Posted by Rentacop

I notice Dorner holds a high government clearance and was found suitable to serve in the Navy and LAPD . So how well will universal background checks work ?

[Tackleberry1]

This debate is bordering on silly...

Who here excused Dorners actions? I've not seen it?

I do see a divide between those of us who are beyond accepting the LAPD's account and those who seem to think it's inappropriate to question them because life has been lost.

Not questioning a department of such questionable ethics because people have died makes about much sence as agreeing with Pierce Morgan when he asserts that gun rights advocates just don't care about dead children in CT.

Anyone who can't separate the need to hold LEO's accountable from the need to respect fallen officers... and do both... is simply not taking the situation seriously.

Tack

[USMC-Hat]

Read what you have written Tack and you'll find your answers. You don't condone his civilian targets? Does that mean you are ok with him being a cop killer because he got fired? Is it ok for anyone who feels they were wrongfully terminated to go kill their former employers and family members? Does that employer need to be corrupt in some way to make it their fault they created the monster? That's what we need right now a bunch of disgruntled workers shooting those that have "wronged" them.

[ScottA]

This thread is over.