SF anonimity - Page 2
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > SF anonimity

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2010, 11:42 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dunerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 8,480
Liked 33 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

100 years ago, we would have hung the bastards! Today we just call them effin' douches.

Makes one long for the good old days.

__________________

People get the government they deserve.

dunerunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 11:49 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
skullcrusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio,Ohio
Posts: 10,949
Liked 17 Times on 12 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
That's true. Go to the source: New York Times ombudsman Daniel Okrent confirms it is a liberal paper.

(For the benefit of those not living in the U.S. who may not grasp the vernacular meaning of "liberal" in this country, it means "those in favor of a very big, very powerful government at the expense of the individual in terms of liberty, freedom, wealth and property." Stalin, Che and Mao are regarded as "liberals" by those on the left in this country. Many who work at the New York Times and other major news media outlets are hard-core communists.)
+ a gazillion, bkt!

They call themselves "Progressives" based on the movement called the same aroud the turn of the century...huh...must be a centennial thing...hmmm
__________________

From C3Shooter:
Skullcrusher, you are evil, sick, demented, twisted- and my hero!


Quote:
Originally Posted by pandamonium View Post
...without the Second, we cannot protect the rest!
skullcrusher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010, 05:43 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
zhuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sydney, Aust
Posts: 2,031
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
That's true. Go to the source: New York Times ombudsman Daniel Okrent confirms it is a liberal paper.

(For the benefit of those not living in the U.S. who may not grasp the vernacular meaning of "liberal" in this country, it means "those in favor of a very big, very powerful government at the expense of the individual in terms of liberty, freedom, wealth and property." Stalin, Che and Mao are regarded as "liberals" by those on the left in this country. Many who work at the New York Times and other major news media outlets are hard-core communists.)

It is quite strange the different meanings of 'liberal'. Liberal with a capital "L" is something altogether opposite in Australia, as the 'Liberal Party' is our main Conservative/Tory party, opposing the (traditionally, but not quite so much anymore) left wing Labor Party.

[Confusingly, there are some things in Aust (like taxpayer-funded universal health care) which are supported widely across the whole spectrum, those on the right included...which probably makes little sense to you]

But I'm pre-programmed to let the US meaning of 'liberal' kick in when I'm on this forum


Gotta say though...I don't know if anyone bar the completely insane lunar-lefties here (ie the remaining rump of the Aust Communist Party, which got about 168 votes last election lol) would call Stalin/Mao etc 'liberals'
__________________

Illigitimi Non Carborundum - Don't let the bastards grind you down

Quote:
Originally Posted by skullcrusher View Post
Yes, at WalMart, you can pick up a gun, ammo, ski mask and your antidepressants all in one trip. Darn convenient if you ask me...:D
zhuk is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010, 11:47 AM   #14
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TXnorton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Katy,Texas
Posts: 1,376
Default

Recent members of Obama's administration have named Chairman Mao as one of their most inspirational figures. Mao's visage was on one of Obama's White House Christmas Tree ornaments!

Do NOT doubt that the uber-Liberals of the far Left wing of the Liberal Demoncratic party are in fact Socialists, and may in fact be out and out Communists.

The American peole are starting to wake up though, as evidenced by the recent election of Scott Brown in Mass.

As an interesting side note, as this thread was about a Kiwi (NZ) SAS member. We just picked up our best friends, who are New Zealanders, at the airport yesterday. They come visit us every January or February, and we shoot my guns (most that they cannot have in NZ, or in Bermuda where they live half the time), and we also do a quail hunt. These Kiwis are in the (generally) Conservative minority in NZ. But they report that Obama's initial gloss has worn thin and his international reputation is now MUCH lower than it was when he was elected. He is now starting to be seen internationally as a lame duck president (after just a year!).

__________________

TXnorton


Last edited by TXnorton; 01-23-2010 at 12:09 PM.
TXnorton is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010, 12:10 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
Posts: 1,657
Liked 29 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skullcrusher View Post
+ a gazillion, bkt!

They call themselves "Progressives" based on the movement called the same aroud the turn of the century...huh...must be a centennial thing...hmmm
Well, this morning in the bathroom, I had a movement that pretty well describes their movement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXnorton View Post
...lame duck president (after just a year!).
Personally, I'll replace the "u" with an "i" in that statement. It seems that whatever problems are facing the U.S., the Great Organiser does nothing but blame it ALL on Bush. Sure he wasn't the greatest president but he's not responsible for everything Obozo wants to spew his way.

__________________
AcidFlashGordon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes