security camera opinions.
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > security camera opinions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2012, 04:29 PM   #1
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2919 Times on 1718 Posts

Default security camera opinions.

What would you consider to be a better setup? A good wide angle view where you can see the entire area in question (stair well) or a tight angle that provides an optimal picture for identification (close up photo)?
My motion sensitive camera automatically takes a picture and forwards it to a special email and immediately alerts me as well as sounding a warning alarm in the house.
If I have a wide angle view I get a picture like the first one.
If its in tight I get something like the second but clearly don't have as good a view of the entire stair well.
Obviously the purpose of the picture is to id the person for Leo if necessary. The dvr is constantly recording regardless.

ch01_12_06_03_16_19_15.jpg   ch01_12_06_18_11_30_19.jpg  
__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-18-2012, 04:38 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
vincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mid-Atlantic NC
Posts: 4,122
Liked 1958 Times on 1030 Posts
Likes Given: 4286

Default

Can you pick up a feed on your TV? A buddy of mine does home security, his home system is set up to automatically switch the TV channel to the camera on the front door when the doorbell is rung.

If it were me, I'd go with the wide angle. You could easily see if the guy on the left has a weapon, or if it's multiple people, not so much on the right.

If it comes down to a matter of LEO IDing a suspect, they have all kinds of video enhancement software, my first concern would be knowing who and what I'd be up against.

Just my .02...

__________________
Member NRA, GOA, GRNC, SAF, NAGR

Proud Supporter of USA Shooting
vincent is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 04:44 PM   #3
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2919 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

Yes I can pull up a direct feed even from my phone if I choose. With the tight angle I can tell if someone is there and I get a great shot of their face but obviously don't have a great view. Wide angle I can see everything but if I'm not home identifying the person in court would likely be impossible unless they happen to look up at the camera.

__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 05:19 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: gilmer,texas
Posts: 1,019
Liked 35 Times on 29 Posts

Default

I'd vote for the wide angle setting, if using it as a warning device.

We have a camera monitoring our front door. Not so much for a warning, but as a means of identifying someone before opening the door to them. For that purpose the tight angle it supplies is what we need, but as a security warning, it leaves something to be desired because when the warning sounds on our monitor inside the home, it does not always show what set it off. It is possible for someone to set it off, then move out of view.

I would think the same would apply to your situation if you use a tight angle.

__________________
gollygee is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 05:32 PM   #5
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,402
Liked 2739 Times on 1332 Posts
Likes Given: 1392

Default

Mountainman,

Unless I am mistaken it seems like you could move the camera in example two down lower much more and get most of the stairwell and the close up at the same time! There is a whole lot of wall above the subjects head that is not necessary?

03

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 05:49 PM   #6
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2919 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

I could but then if they stand on the top stair I won't see them at all. It's a tough choice.

__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 06:08 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
levelcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 977
Liked 164 Times on 116 Posts
Likes Given: 260

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman13 View Post
I could but then if they stand on the top stair I won't see them at all. It's a tough choice.
With this being the limiting factor I would go with the wide angle shot. If at all possible another camera would give you the best of both worlds. I was looking at an 18 camera system at Costco the other day, the picture was too grainy to make out the faces very well so I didn't look too hard.

I like the idea of the early warning system, mine poops like crazy and barks and bites a lot...well barks anyway.
__________________

Don't question my right to own a gun and I won't question your stupidity not to.

You give Peace a chance, we will cover you if it doesn't work out.

levelcross is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 06:12 PM   #8
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2919 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

Lol. Yeah I'm leaning towards leaving it at the tight angle and getting another camera for a wide view eventually.

__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 08:32 PM   #9
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2919 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

I thought about it a little more and came up with the best option. I drilled a hole through the door and mounted the camera to a plate screwed to the inside of the door. Put the camera in sideways. Now it covers the entire stairwell and catches a tight facial shot. Impossible to access the wires in any way from outside now too.

__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 04:06 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
levelcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 977
Liked 164 Times on 116 Posts
Likes Given: 260

Default

Nice solution Mountain.

__________________

Don't question my right to own a gun and I won't question your stupidity not to.

You give Peace a chance, we will cover you if it doesn't work out.

levelcross is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Camera for the range kaido The Club House 0 01-26-2012 08:40 AM
Times you wish you had a camera... AusLach The Club House 14 04-12-2011 02:00 AM
Red Dot Optic for your camera... ARnoob Optics & Mounts 0 05-13-2010 04:35 PM
Gun Camera Yunus Firearm Accessories & Gear 9 12-04-2009 01:09 AM



Newest Threads