Opposition to deer hunting with handguns can't agree on why it's wrong
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > Opposition to deer hunting with handguns can't agree on why it's wrong

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2008, 07:25 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sculker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 247
Default Opposition to deer hunting with handguns can't agree on why it's wrong



Opposition to deer hunting with handguns can't agree on why it's wrong

A change in deer hunting laws in Delaware, providing more opportunities for the use of handguns, has (predictably) drawn some criticism. Amusingly, though, not only does the criticism not agree with facts and logic, it doesn't even agree with itself.

On the one hand, we have Scott Vogel, of the outrageously misnamed "Freedom States Alliance," who argues that handguns used for deer hunting are "too powerful."

The Freedom States Alliance is a national nonprofit organization that is dedicated to reducing gun-related deaths and injuries through public awareness campaigns. According to the FSA Web site, .50 caliber guns have effective ranges up to 2,000 yards, or 20 football fields laid end to end. Deer hunters typically shoot at ranges of 150-200 yards.

.50 caliber rifles can be effective at that range (in the hands of an extremely skilled shooter), but a .50 caliber handgun (like the .500 S&W Magnum) could be fired all day (assuming the shooter's ability to sustain that kind of recoil, and his wallet's ability to sustain the ammo costs, permitted it) without the intended target ever noticing he was being fired at. By the way, Delaware law does not require that deer-hunting handguns be of .50 caliber--and most hunters who choose to take the opportunities offered by this rule change will probably not go out and buy one.

"We don't support this change," said Scott Vogel, communications director of FSA. "A .50-caliber handgun can easily puncture a police officer's vest."

Probably--but no more easily than any deer rifle (and probably less easily than most deer rifle cartridges). Besides, do Delaware police have a habit of disguising themselves as deer during hunting season--why is a hunting gun's ability to defeat body armor even an issue?

On the other hand, we get the argument that handguns are not powerful enough to hunt deer.

The Humane Society of the United States worries not only about the safety of the hunter but of the deer. The group worries that deer shot by handguns would suffer needlessly.

"If the hunters were truly interested in a quick and painless death for the deer, they would not use a handgun," said Casey Pheiffer, campaign manager of the Wildlife Abuse Campaign for the Humane Society.

Granted, the range at which a deer can be humanely taken is probably less, in most cases, with a handgun than with a rifle. Within that range, though, with adequate care on the part of the hunter, a powerful handgun is quite up to the task of ethical deer hunting, and will probably in most cases kill a deer more quickly than can generally be done with bow and arrow. Besides, my guess is that being torn about by wolves or a mountain lion is probably less than pleasant, too--that's one of the downsides of being helpless prey.

"Helpless prey," by the way, is exactly what citizen disarmament advocacy groups like the Freedom States Alliance would like to make us.

http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2008/11/opposition-to-deer-hunting-with.html
__________________

Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY

sculker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-20-2008, 03:22 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 9,639
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts

Default

I no longer hunt, but I would imagine that hunting with a handgun would require immense stalking skill, and would more often favor the deer.

Sounds to me like they just don't want to admit that handguns are legitimate.

__________________
Benning Boy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 04:40 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 61
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default Handgun hunting

at my advanced age (over 70) and having hunted deer with revolvers for over 25 yrs I feel as though I am able to make an informed statement. Most of these anti statments are just coastal babble by yuppys with NO informed or practical knowledge. I have taken deer with revolvers from 15yds to 127yds all with ONE shot. I use revolvers with open sights, aimpoint, and 2 power scope, so all of those babbling coastal yuppys can bring it on.The deer season starts in two days in this state boys guess I better take a nap to get ready

__________________
gocritter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 09:49 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 36 Times on 30 Posts

Default

Got a buddy that just took a nice 6 point at 244 yards with his pistol.

It is a Rem xp-100 in 260 Rem.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 12:58 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Fayettedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 121
Liked 4 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benning Boy View Post
I no longer hunt, but I would imagine that hunting with a handgun would require immense stalking skill, and would more often favor the deer.

Sounds to me like they just don't want to admit that handguns are legitimate.
+1 on both points!
__________________
Fayettedave is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 07:03 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Slickrick214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 187
Default

These people are so stupid its actually funny. I guess thats what happens when you live in a Commie state run by libtards like Biden. Delaware is just another state along with NJ, California, Oregon, Mass, and Washington state that I wish would just sink in the ocean.

__________________
Slickrick214 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 07:08 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sgtdeath66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 964
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sculker View Post


Opposition to deer hunting with handguns can't agree on why it's wrong

A change in deer hunting laws in Delaware, providing more opportunities for the use of handguns, has (predictably) drawn some criticism. Amusingly, though, not only does the criticism not agree with facts and logic, it doesn't even agree with itself.

On the one hand, we have Scott Vogel, of the outrageously misnamed "Freedom States Alliance," who argues that handguns used for deer hunting are "too powerful."

The Freedom States Alliance is a national nonprofit organization that is dedicated to reducing gun-related deaths and injuries through public awareness campaigns. According to the FSA Web site, .50 caliber guns have effective ranges up to 2,000 yards, or 20 football fields laid end to end. Deer hunters typically shoot at ranges of 150-200 yards.

.50 caliber rifles can be effective at that range (in the hands of an extremely skilled shooter), but a .50 caliber handgun (like the .500 S&W Magnum) could be fired all day (assuming the shooter's ability to sustain that kind of recoil, and his wallet's ability to sustain the ammo costs, permitted it) without the intended target ever noticing he was being fired at. By the way, Delaware law does not require that deer-hunting handguns be of .50 caliber--and most hunters who choose to take the opportunities offered by this rule change will probably not go out and buy one.

"We don't support this change," said Scott Vogel, communications director of FSA. "A .50-caliber handgun can easily puncture a police officer's vest."

Probably--but no more easily than any deer rifle (and probably less easily than most deer rifle cartridges). Besides, do Delaware police have a habit of disguising themselves as deer during hunting season--why is a hunting gun's ability to defeat body armor even an issue?

On the other hand, we get the argument that handguns are not powerful enough to hunt deer.

The Humane Society of the United States worries not only about the safety of the hunter but of the deer. The group worries that deer shot by handguns would suffer needlessly.

"If the hunters were truly interested in a quick and painless death for the deer, they would not use a handgun," said Casey Pheiffer, campaign manager of the Wildlife Abuse Campaign for the Humane Society.

Granted, the range at which a deer can be humanely taken is probably less, in most cases, with a handgun than with a rifle. Within that range, though, with adequate care on the part of the hunter, a powerful handgun is quite up to the task of ethical deer hunting, and will probably in most cases kill a deer more quickly than can generally be done with bow and arrow. Besides, my guess is that being torn about by wolves or a mountain lion is probably less than pleasant, too--that's one of the downsides of being helpless prey.

"Helpless prey," by the way, is exactly what citizen disarmament advocacy groups like the Freedom States Alliance would like to make us.

http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2008/11/opposition-to-deer-hunting-with.html
they just want a reason to outlaw certain firearms and they will do and say whatever they can to acheive this, and the bit about it being able to defeat body armor is just liberal mumbo jumbo trying to use law enforcments safety to ban a great cartridge that was designed for hunting into something a gangbanger would use. as if your going to see a thug toting around a four pound reolver in his already baggy pants
__________________

Wars begin where u will
But they do not end where you please-Machiavelli


He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man- Dr. Johnson


"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams

your my best friend but if the zombies start chasing us im tripping you

sgtdeath66 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 09:14 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oak Harbor,Wa
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdeath66 View Post
they just want a reason to outlaw certain firearms and they will do and say whatever they can to acheive this, and the bit about it being able to defeat body armor is just liberal mumbo jumbo trying to use law enforcments safety to ban a great cartridge that was designed for hunting into something a gangbanger would use. as if your going to see a thug toting around a four pound reolver in his already baggy pants
I would like to see the aftermath behind the revolver of some gangbanger trying to shoot a .500 in the sideways, gangster style. Might as well have those broken tooth stubs crowned with gold... wait, did that already happen?
__________________
Wenonah is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 09:26 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 9,639
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts

Default

Night of the Living Thread...

128977911808905285.jpg  
__________________
Benning Boy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition sculker The Club House 18 01-24-2011 01:44 PM
Deer Hunting Methods Voltron Hunting Forum 18 10-29-2010 02:44 AM
Deer Hunting with Semi-Auto NelsonMuntz Hunting Forum 8 05-06-2008 09:24 PM
C&R eligable firearms and deer hunting Doug1627 Curio & Relic Discussion 13 03-07-2008 02:10 AM
I agree 100% with Ted on this video Tony Soprano The Club House 9 11-24-2007 04:01 PM