Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > Nice shot! Court kills NYC gun law

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2008, 04:32 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sculker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 247
Default Nice shot! Court kills NYC gun law



Saturday, May 17, 2008
WEAPONS OF CHOICE
Nice shot! Court kills NYC gun law
Phyllis Schlafly praises appellate panel for ruling against city suit targeting manufacturer
Posted: May 16, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

By Phyllis Schlafly

The media have been telling us to watch the gun-control case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, where we await a decision about Americans' Second Amendment rights. But the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just handed down an equally important gun decision that has additional implications against judicial supremacy.

The court, which convenes in New York City, shot down the longtime liberal dream of achieving gun control by suing gun manufacturers for crimes committed by firearms. In a remarkable decision, this federal appellate court dismissed City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. and protected gun corporations against frivolous lawsuits in state and federal courts.

The lawsuit was brought by the City of New York in order to seek control over gun suppliers. At stake was not merely money but also whether liberals would obtain from judicial activists the gun control they could not get from legislatures.

This decision provides a road map for how Congress should withdraw jurisdiction from judicial supremacists in other fields, too. The decision is a sweeping affirmation of Congress' power to stop future and pending lawsuits in federal and state courts.

(Column continues below)


This ruling broke an alarming trend of judicial supremacy and stopped outrageous lawsuits that tried to impede the sale of guns because of illegal acts committed by New York City residents and others. Billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg was left empty-handed in his attempt to sue businesses concerning crimes committed by residents of his city.

The lawsuit cited the harm from gun sales while ignoring evidence that the benefits far outweigh the harm. The trial court sided with Bloomberg, but the appellate court said "no" and put an end to the nonsense.

Congress had legislated the basis for this decision by passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act in 2005. The PLCAA protects against a "qualified civil liability action," defined broadly to include almost any lawsuit brought against a gun manufacturer or seller based on "the criminal or unlawful misuse" of a firearm distributed in interstate commerce. On the day it was signed into law by President Bush, gun manufacturers moved to dismiss this case, and the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has now enforced the law.

The appellate court rejected an argument that this law denied access to the courts. New York City can and does sue all the time, but Congress properly rejected the ridiculous notion that the city could sue businesses over a typically beneficial product that was later used illegally.

Should General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. be held liable for crimes committed by drunk drivers, or baseball bat suppliers be sued for criminal beatings inflicted with their products? Of course not. It was an outrage that courts even entertained such actions against gun manufacturers and suppliers.

If Congress had not effectively withdrawn jurisdiction, gun manufacturers would be reluctant to produce guns and many might go out of business. This intimidation would deter the lawful sale of guns.

That's exactly what gun-control advocates have long wanted: legislation from the bench that they could not persuade real legislatures to pass. A majority of legislators, who are elected, see the absurdity of gun control and recognize the valuable self-defense function of guns.

The role of judges should be (as U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts repeated in his confirmation hearings) like that of baseball umpires: calling the balls and strikes, but not changing how many strikes constitute a strikeout. Judges should interpret ambiguous laws fairly but not legislate from the bench.

Gun control has become so unpopular that not even the Democratic presidential candidates dare brag about their views. Instead, the anti-gun crowd hopes to get what it wants from supremacist judges.

Misuse of courts to obtain a result contrary to the will of the American people should not be allowed on other vital issues. Congress should also take away from judges issues such as the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, the Boy Scouts and the definition of marriage.

Take another example: Federal courts should not entertain lawsuits by illegal immigrants against local ordinances that enforce U.S. immigration laws.

This refreshing gun decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals signals the way for Congress to return the judiciary to its proper place in our constitutional separation-of-powers system. In the previous Congress, the House of Representatives did pass bills to curb court mischief about the Pledge of Allegiance and the definition of marriage, and now it's time for the U.S. Senate to step up to the plate and take action against judicial supremacists.

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=64358
__________________

Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY

sculker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-18-2008, 12:57 PM   #2
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1304 Times on 663 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
The court, which convenes in New York City, shot down the longtime liberal dream of achieving gun control by suing gun manufacturers for crimes committed by firearms.
Shouldn't that read "...for crimes committed by criminals using firearms..."?

Anyway, this is great news.
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 07:59 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,614
Liked 9 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
Shouldn't that read "...for crimes committed by criminals using firearms..."?
No, no. The criminal is just a tool in the clutches of the evil gun.
__________________

9x18=Makarov

ScottG is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 09:52 AM   #4
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1304 Times on 663 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottG View Post
No, no. The criminal is just a tool in the clutches of the evil gun.
Ah, now I get it. It's kinda like the evil SUVs that are always causing accidents and killing people.
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 05:54 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,614
Liked 9 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
Ah, now I get it. It's kinda like the evil SUVs that are always causing accidents and killing people.
See! You do get it! Give yourself a green* star....

* One green star entitles you to absolve yourself from ten pounds of carbon pollution....
__________________

9x18=Makarov

ScottG is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 09:29 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 100
Default

wow i hadnt heard about this case until now. thats probably the most libby thought i have ever heard. i could probably come up with 100+ analogies to back up what im saying but im sure you all have some of your own.

__________________
Chance_P is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Obama kills 2 people MrKimber The Club House 6 04-15-2009 03:30 PM
Boy kills himself at gun show Slickrick214 The Club House 3 11-09-2008 06:21 PM
Got me a nice Single Shot I think JiroZero713 General Shotgun Discussion 1 10-19-2008 11:38 PM
7 shot cylinder in a 6 shot course of fire fitzy Revolver Handguns 1 01-31-2008 10:07 PM