Well lets see, being from Oklahoma and it taking place here, we have gotten a lot of news surrounding it. The pharmacist went on Bill O'rielly on Fox and stated the reason why he came back and shot the kid was because he was conscious and moving, fumbling in his pockets, he still feared the kid had a gun and he thought the kid had shot one of the ladies hiding in the back, because he could here her crying and screaming. He stated that here also for the record. Now, unless the DA has a video angle we have not seen, you cannot tell whether the kid was conscious or not, because all the video the public and news has exposed, you cannot see the kid on the floor, the view is blocked and you can only see the pharmacist shooting at the floor.
IMHO, the pharmacist should not have walked back over and shot the kid five more times. He was either really sincerely still scared and afraid for his life, or he was really pissed the other kid got away and was taking out his frustration on this kid. Either way, it is going to make for a interesting trial and an difficult jury selection. Most everyone here is siding with the pharmacist.
"There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter." - Hemingway
“The greatest ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about.”