Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   The Club House (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f12/)
-   -   Just die already, you are no longer worth medical treatment (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f12/just-die-already-you-no-longer-worth-medical-treatment-10761/)

johnsteele 02-10-2009 04:38 AM

Just die already, you are no longer worth medical treatment
 
If you or your parents are no longer young, you might find this interesting. Actually it ought to turn your stomach.

This was inserted into the Pork-O-Palooza bill at the last minute. And when you read it, remember this isn't speculation, it will be federal law and national policy in a week or so ...

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey

Quote:

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey

Commentary by Betsy McCaughey

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy.

Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.

Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.

New Penalties

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.

Hidden Provisions

If the Obama administration’s economic stimulus bill passes the Senate in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.

The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

More Scrutiny Needed

On Friday, President Obama called it “inexcusable and irresponsible” for senators to delay passing the stimulus bill. In truth, this bill needs more scrutiny.

The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product. Yet the bill treats health care the way European governments do: as a cost problem instead of a growth industry. Imagine limiting growth and innovation in the electronics or auto industry during this downturn. This stimulus is dangerous to your health and the economy.

(Betsy McCaughey is former lieutenant governor of New York and is an adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The opinions expressed are her own.)

To contact the writer of this column: Betsy McCaughey at Betsymross@aol.com
Last Updated: February 9, 2009 00:01 EST
----------------------
I never thought i would see the day when this kind of thing would become national policy in what used to be the land of the free and the home of the brave.

God save what is left of the Republic because the citizens may no longer be able.

anm2_man 02-10-2009 11:01 PM

Yeah - Have I know about this in this bill. I'm 65 and not really happy about this, but it got passed this PM. Our Govt leaders don't care about what any of us think, and that includes the youngsters. This country is going to change radically very soon. It maybe good or it could be very BAD !

bobbyb13 02-10-2009 11:04 PM

puke
 
That is the only word that comes to mind. Tell your aged parents, or friends in my case, you are not worth the money to take care of. Bastages.

cpttango30 02-10-2009 11:21 PM

On the other hand. Why does a 90 year old lady need two new knees and two new hips? But a friend of mine who had both of his knees and hips destroyed in Viet Nam can't get squat. He has VA insurance and she had medicare.

Is our health care system the best NO. But do we need this shoved down our throats? NO again. You know what is going to happen don't you. Socialized health care goes into affect . Well lookie here you own guns you can't have health care until you give up your guns. Oh and if you don't give them up we will take 75% of your yearly earning as a penalty. If you are retired then we will take 75% of your total assets including your house cars, boats, retirement accounts 401K and what ever else you have stashed away. Then we will come and take your guns and keep them all.

johnsteele 02-10-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpttango30 (Post 70042)
On the other hand. Why does a 90 year old lady need two new knees and two new hips? But a friend of mine who had both of his knees and hips destroyed in Viet Nam can't get squat. He has VA insurance and she had medicare.

Is our health care system the best NO. But do we need this shoved down our throats? NO again. You know what is going to happen don't you. Socialized health care goes into affect . Well lookie here you own guns you can't have health care until you give up your guns. Oh and if you don't give them up we will take 75% of your yearly earning as a penalty. If you are retired then we will take 75% of your total assets including your house cars, boats, retirement accounts 401K and what ever else you have stashed away. Then we will come and take your guns and keep them all.

If you like the VA system you will love ObamaCare! The VA is a good example of why the Feds should not be doing this.

Even the Canadians are looking at giving up single payer and going to a parallel private system. At the end of the day I'm not sure that's going to help much, the Brits already have that and look at their $#%$#%#-up situation.

ScottG 02-11-2009 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnsteele (Post 70051)
Even the Canadians are looking at giving up single payer and going to a parallel private system. At the end of the day I'm not sure that's going to help much, the Brits already have that and look at their $#%$#%#-up situation.

That's what's so annoying about the whole situation. We resisted government encroachment, now everyone everywhere else is wanting to get rid of slave healthcare and we seem to be moving towards it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.