With the powers the government has claimed they 'possess' to keep us sheeple safe... I'd be VERY careful, throwing the terrorism word around.
I would be quite happy if the town fathers could handle such a criminal the way they may have done a hundred years ago, and just strung the bastard up, for shooting at random people. Now, we are expected to feed, clothe, house, and take care of his medical and mental health for the rest of his life.
The purpose of terrorism is to terrorize. That is what he was doing. I don't really care what his political, philosophical or religious reasons are, he is a terrorist, treat him like one. The water board is the new scaffold.
"It is better to be too skeptical then too credulous"
Paradoxically, I have NO problem with a public lynching, once found guilty and exhausted appeals.
I think a big problem with today's youth is their sheltered states.
I wonder what would happen to crime rates if children were taken to watch a crying, blubbering man be hanged to death, then told 'This is what happens to bad people.'
Originally Posted by texaswoodworker
I have to agree with Tex. on this. If every state had a death penalty that was used, in a public manner, crime rates would plummet. I also think that if the number of appeals were limited, and if there was a law on the books that bumped the BG to the head of the line if more than 4 credible witnesses can testify it was him, crime rates would be almost non-existent. Not only do we need a death penalty for every state, we need an express lane!
Is it better to do the right thing for the wrong reason, or to do the wrong thing for the right reason? If you do the wrong thing for the right reason, is it still the wrong thing?
Si vis pacem parabellum.
To those who wish to take away our Second Amendment rights. What will you do when we, all 100,000,000 of us, stand as one, and say no?