Hopefully, some of the other victim's families will be able to get closure now that his DNA is in the system. Atleast in the end, he finally did something right. He saved the taxpayer's a sh!tload of money.
Is it better to do the right thing for the wrong reason, or to do the wrong thing for the right reason? If you do the wrong thing for the right reason, is it still the wrong thing?
Si vis pacem para bellum.
There are two ways of doing something. Right and again.