Cybersecurity Bill includes Mag ban!!
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > Cybersecurity Bill includes Mag ban!!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-29-2012, 11:48 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mdemotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 136
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Default Cybersecurity Bill includes Mag ban!!

The cybersecurity bill heading for the Senate contains a provision making magazines that hold 10+ rds illegal!! 10year prison term!! Hear we go again!! It didnt take long for the vultures in DC, NY and NJ to circle their pray!

__________________
mdemotte is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-29-2012, 11:54 PM   #2
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2917 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

Then they better revoke my license if they pass it or kiss my lawyers a$$
Class b license to carry= up to 10 rnds
Class a ltc= high capacity= more than 10 rnds
I didn't just pay $600 for a pre-ban glock 20 to have the 15 rnd mags taken away.
Molon labe b!tche$ gfy
Nemo me impune lacessit

__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 12:01 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dog2000tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3735 Times on 1824 Posts
Likes Given: 13269

Default

got any links?

__________________

Member: NRA GOA

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD

dog2000tj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 12:10 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mdemotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 136
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog2000tj
got any links?
Cant find original.... Heres another one..,

http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure
__________________
mdemotte is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 12:19 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dog2000tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3735 Times on 1824 Posts
Likes Given: 13269

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdemotte View Post
Thanks

not surprising in the least who the authors and co-sponsors of this amendment are. Guess it's time to write my Senators and Congressmen again
__________________

Member: NRA GOA

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD

dog2000tj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 12:53 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mdemotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 136
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman13
Then they better revoke my license if they pass it or kiss my lawyers a$$
Class b license to carry= up to 10 rnds
Class a ltc= high capacity= more than 10 rnds
I didn't just pay $600 for a pre-ban glock 20 to have the 15 rnd mags taken away.
Molon labe b!tche$ gfy
Nemo me impune lacessit
You must live in Massachusetts... Id be pissed too thats alot of work!!
__________________
mdemotte is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 12:58 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
readygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,238
Liked 742 Times on 435 Posts
Likes Given: 958

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdemotte View Post
Not sure if i understand , It says SA-2575 will make it illegal to own or transfer large capacity feeding devices. Then down further it says sales and transfer will be allowed until the law takes effect. So can we keep the ones we already have. or will millions of high cap mags be confiscated.
__________________

The Founders DID anticipate that arms technology would advance, that's why the 2nd amendment doesn't say "the right to keep and bear a musket".......

readygirl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 01:02 AM   #8
10-32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mountainman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2917 Times on 1718 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdemotte

You must live in Massachusetts... Id be pissed too thats alot of work!!
Yep. When I called all the gun shops within 100 miles they told me good luck. It took about 4 months to find the damn thing.
__________________

I don't need No stinking signature.

mountainman13 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 01:15 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mdemotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 136
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by readygirl

Not sure if i understand , It says SA-2575 will make it illegal to own or transfer large capacity feeding devices. Then down further it says sales and transfer will be allowed until the law takes effect. So can we keep the ones we already have. or will millions of high cap mags be confiscated.
Yeah I didnt understand that either.... The first article I seen said it would be all mags... Which would be unheard off ( door to door confiscation would cost billions) . I would think that it would mags sold after the law. You would have to have proof that what you have is "preban" imagine going to the range and getting pulled over and having "prove" your 2012 glock was in fact preban!!
__________________
mdemotte is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 01:58 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yunus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: |,Maryland
Posts: 4,871
Liked 1152 Times on 690 Posts
Likes Given: 362

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdemotte View Post
Yeah I didnt understand that either.... The first article I seen said it would be all mags... Which would be unheard off ( door to door confiscation would cost billions) . I would think that it would mags sold after the law. You would have to have proof that what you have is "preban" imagine going to the range and getting pulled over and having "prove" your 2012 glock was in fact preban!!
You don't need proof in Maryland where this is the law right now. You can't buy or sell a 30 round magazine but owning and using one is fine and no "proof" is required to show that you bought it before the law took effect.
__________________

"Good people drink good beer."
Hunter S. Thompson

Yunus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Open Carry Bill Reform Bill Proposed HighCaliber Utah Gun Forum 2 03-04-2012 10:06 PM
New CA Bill armsmaster270 Legal and Activism 1 07-26-2011 04:34 AM
House Bill 1016: Washington State's LEGAL Suppressor USAGE Bill Dillinger Legal and Activism 8 03-16-2011 02:15 PM
Obama Set to Create A Cybersecurity Czar With Broad Mandate! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 05-27-2009 01:52 AM
New Bill? bkt Politics, Religion and Controversy 14 02-14-2009 02:58 AM