Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > City is anti firearms property

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2008, 11:28 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Default City is anti firearms property

Here is an outrageous firearms-property situation that started a little over a year ago in a Chicago suburb:


A citizen voluntarily stored some firearms at a police station for safekeeping.

The citizen was told they could be left there as long as desired.

The citizen holds a valid Illinois Firearms Possession (FOID) card.

The citizen has proof of ownership of the firearms.

The citizen retains the storage inventory receipt for the firearms.

The firearms are not evidence in any case.

This citizen has requested to recover her firearms several times over the past four months, but was refused, the City stating that it requires a judge’s court order to release them, citing liability concerns in regards to her husband’s mental health.

When the citizen asked the city’s attorney to put into writing the specific laws/codes/statutes they have to override state and federal firearms property rights, they only responded with a declaration stating that they will now destroy the firearms if they are not picked up with a judge’s court order within 30 days.

(Here is a fact that shows that the city is violating this citizen’s gun and property rights): it is perfectly legal for this citizen to buy guns today and bring them home after state authorization and the waiting period. The firearms merchant is not required, and will not, question her about the mental condition or criminal convictions of her family and friends. Federal and state laws protect the dealer and the business transaction from direct liability. So….why doesn’t the city recognize those same procedural laws and liability protections?



(Excerpts from the certified letter of 17 July 08 to “the citizen” from the Ancel Glink law firm of Chicago on behalf of the City of Oak Forest, Illinois.)

…..The City has advised you on multiple occasions that it requires a court order signed by a judge prior to releasing said guns…..

……Your refusal to abide by the administrative procedures presented for the release of the aforementioned firearms is deemed evidence of abandonment of this property....

……Accordingly, we hereby advise you that if no court order to release the guns is presented to the Oak Forest Police Department within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, the City will commence procedures to have the aforementioned six (6) weapons destroyed according to proper law enforcement procedures for the destruction of firearms as set forth by statute….


The citizen is tired from the dispute, and also, cannot afford an attorney. Can anyone give advice, or references to someone who could help?


Contact us at: bourilfamily@comcast.net

__________________
tornajoe is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-24-2008, 04:17 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FALPhil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tornajoe View Post
This citizen has requested to recover her firearms several times over the past four months, but was refused, the City stating that it requires a judge’s court order to release them, citing liability concerns in regards to her husband’s mental health.
I would question the sanity of anyone who would put any private property in the hands of an government department for safekeeping.
__________________
FALPhil is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 07:42 PM   #3
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FALPhil View Post
I would question the sanity of anyone who would put any private property in the hands of an government department for safekeeping.
That was my first thought, too. There's probably more to the story, particularly the part about "her husband's mental health" issue. Even so, I'd find a buddy I trusted to keep my guns if I felt the need to empty my house of them.

An enterprising attorney would certainly take this gig pro-bono if the city ends up destroying her firearms, and take a percentage of the award.
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 08:36 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3475 Times on 1607 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Ill. Chapter of the NRA would be a good place to start. I would also start making some inquiries to some local attorney's who might be willing to do a job like this for the media coverage alone.

IF they are dumb enough to actually destroy the property, then the family will be on the receiving end of what should be a very large "out of court settlement" as they will have completely crossed the line and set up residence on the other side...

JD

__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 10:42 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,900
Liked 2056 Times on 827 Posts
Likes Given: 2706

Default

I sent word to them through a friend on another board who lives close to them. For them to get ahold of the NRA to start with.

__________________
opaww is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 06:43 AM   #6
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
notdku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hill Country,Texas
Posts: 5,563
Liked 698 Times on 387 Posts
Likes Given: 729

Default

Something doesn't seem right. Storing guns at the police station?

__________________

Not Registered? Register now! - It's free and helps the community grow.

notdku is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 11:03 AM   #7
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notdku View Post
Something doesn't seem right. Storing guns at the police station?
Some folks do this on a very temporary basis when they move from one state to another and need to get a permit, or until they can find an FFL. But like I said, there's more to this story than we know. What was the reason for storing them at the cop shop in the first place??
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 06:15 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RL357Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany,New York
Posts: 3,251
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts

Default

If nothing else is going on behind the scenes, than this is just another case of Police abuse (see the "Is SWAT a Joke" thread) , since the city officials would not even be aware of the situation had the police just complied and returned her guns. If she is robbed, raped, or murdered while they screw her around , the city will have one hell of a law suit against them!

__________________
Guns Have Only Two Enemies-Rust and Politicians
"The United States Constitution (c) 1791 - All Rights Reserved"
If Guns Kill, Do Pencils Mis-spell Words?
Pain is Weakness Leaving the Body - USMC
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum"
RL357Mag is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 01:21 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 163
Default

If all the facts are correct, I would definately suggest looking into the legality of that dept's actions. The last dept. I worked for required a court order if the gun had been used in a crime. I don't neccessarily agree with this as long as the suspect that used the gun wasn't the one trying to get it back. Guns should be treated the same as any other property, assuming the owner is sane.

The only reason I can think of that this might be legit, and I may be way off here, is to prove ownership. Here in FL, it's very difficult for us to prove gun ownership. I feel that if proof is presented, give the gun back to the rightful owner.

__________________
chorst294 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 02:00 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RL357Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany,New York
Posts: 3,251
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chorst294 View Post
If all the facts are correct, I would definately suggest looking into the legality of that dept's actions. The last dept. I worked for required a court order if the gun had been used in a crime. I don't neccessarily agree with this as long as the suspect that used the gun wasn't the one trying to get it back. Guns should be treated the same as any other property, assuming the owner is sane.

The only reason I can think of that this might be legit, and I may be way off here, is to prove ownership. Here in FL, it's very difficult for us to prove gun ownership. I feel that if proof is presented, give the gun back to the rightful owner.

The original poster stated that she has an "inventory receipt" and proof of ownership, AND the firearms are not evidence in any case.
__________________
Guns Have Only Two Enemies-Rust and Politicians
"The United States Constitution (c) 1791 - All Rights Reserved"
If Guns Kill, Do Pencils Mis-spell Words?
Pain is Weakness Leaving the Body - USMC
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum"
RL357Mag is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Californians Taking Responsibility For Their Own Safety, Protection of Property sculker The Club House 2 07-10-2008 06:37 AM
Weapons on Federal Property RMBLON Legal and Activism 8 05-08-2008 10:38 AM
Leaving the City Deagle07 Survival & Sustenance Living Forum 7 08-14-2007 09:32 PM
U.N. anti gun/anti freedom movement opaww Legal and Activism 3 05-08-2007 09:31 PM