Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > The Club House > Californians Taking Responsibility For Their Own Safety, Protection of Property

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2008, 10:28 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sculker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 247
Default Californians Taking Responsibility For Their Own Safety, Protection of Property

Californians Taking Responsibility For Their Own Safety, Protection of Property

In California, residents there are banding together and saying "NO" to those out-of-control elements that could forever change their way of life.

Sadly, we're not talking about residents saying "enough" to crime and pushing to loosen antiquated gun control regs. Although the voices crying out for such empowerment there is growing.

No, instead, the boogey-man that has Californians terrified -- and fighting back -- is FIRE.

"The owner of a hardware store refused payment from volunteer firefighters for crucial supplies. When a local radio station called for money to help defray firefighting costs, people descended on the Redwood Drive-In, known for its malts, shakes and curly fries, and donated more than $4,000.

"Landscapers whacked and carted away brush around houses free of charge. A caterer fed 150 volunteer firefighters daily. One market delivered submarine sandwiches to the weary workers, while residents baked gooey cakes and made quinoa salads. A fire chief's wife grilled steak fajitas for a crew of inmates. Another woman delivered tinctures and balms to firefighters to soothe sore muscles and dry throats. On a map in the Boonville firehouse, a sign offered free massages.

"When the blazes broke out, Leggett, population 300, had more fires than firefighters until an unsanctioned call went out on local radio and some 40 people with rakes and shovels began showing up at the firehouse every morning."

The parallels are amazing, aren't they? Not much different than people wanting to protect themselves either on a college campus, or on the streets of Los Angeles or San Francisco. Especially when the harsh realization that government cannot -- or will not -- protect you sets in. Like a two-by-four board between the eyes, it is that kind of wake-up call.

Here is where a resident realizes she is her only resource:

"Residents expressed both pride and shock that they mostly had to fend for themselves. "This community of rugged individualists pulling together is part of the reason we love where we live," said Deborah Cahn, who with her family owns Navarro Vineyards. "But isn't this what government is supposed to do?"

Welcome to reality, Ms. Cahn. Government has no responsibility to protect you, or your property. If they can get there in time, they might do so. That equipment was diverted to fight fires in more "well-to-do" neighborhoods would be maddening.

So-called rugged individualists are usually the first ones to look out for their safety and well-being. Perhaps it is the writer of the story who doesn't understand that a rugged individualist would NOT be waiting on a government handout, or help to arrive. Such individuals dig in and attack the task at hand, before it gets out of hand.

Nevertheless, to the Californians who are fending for themselves without question, hats off to you. I wish you well and hope the fire season dies down soon. We are pulling for you. For those who are dismayed the government isn't doing more, keep fighting. But I remind you that you moved to a region where fire danger is high every year. You took the risk, and the responsibility is yours alone.

I find it interesting that moms across this nation are occasionally vilified for carrying a sidearm to protect their children. Yet these same moms in California understand that they are the first line of defense for their families. They get it. Moms in the path of looming firestorms are starting to get it, even if they don't see the connection.

Simply put, Californians -- just like New Orleans residents in the wake of Hurricane Katrina -- are getting a wake-up call regarding what it takes to look after their own, and their neighbors during and immediately after a natural disaster.

NOW, there is one bright spot out of all this; there is no registration, waiting period or background check to obtain rakes, shovels and pump sprayers when purchasing the tools needed to defend property against fire - yet. Can you imagine if there was a waiting period for a garden hose? Hoses are dangerous -- remember they have been used by rogue cops in the movies to beat confessions out of suspects.

Would that it could be so simple for Californians who want the tools to defend their families and lives against violent criminals.

Posted by Brent Greer at 8:46 PM

http://thereadyline.blogspot.com/2008/07/taking-responsibility-for-your-own.html
__________________

Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY

sculker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-10-2008, 01:15 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,615
Liked 9 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Baby steps.....baaaaby steps. Maybe one day they'll regain their freedom. Once they realize they can do for themselves, perhaps they'll understand they can do nearly everything for themselves.

__________________

9x18=Makarov

ScottG is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 06:37 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
matt g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

We have fire crews form volunteer fire departments from as far away as Kansas and Iowa. It's not just California and it is nothing like the article makes it sound. The primary areas that are on fire are by and large strong believers in self sufficiency and community action. Here in the Redding area, we're confronted with fire every year and every year, we, as a community, do our best to aide and support the fire fighting efforts.

I can't find a map that I can cut and paste, but if you look at this one, you'll see the effected areas and notice how far away from the liberal population centers they are.

http://www.oes.ca.gov/WebPage/oeswebsite.nsf/IncidentsXML?readForm

__________________

"'Did you ever wonder why we had to run for shelter when the promise of a brave new world unfurled beneath a clear blue sky? "
Roger Waters

Vote freedom, join the Libertarian Party.


Last edited by matt g; 07-10-2008 at 06:47 AM.
matt g is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Eye glasses, safety glasses. and hearing protection twitcheyfinger Training & Safety 16 05-30-2009 04:13 AM
Who’s responsibility it is opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 01-22-2009 05:38 AM
Need help with buying safety glasses and hearing protection. glock19owner Training & Safety 6 12-02-2008 12:49 PM
City is anti firearms property tornajoe The Club House 9 07-26-2008 02:00 AM
Weapons on Federal Property RMBLON Legal and Activism 8 05-08-2008 10:38 AM



Newest Threads