You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Discussion Forums > History >

WWII Tanks

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2014, 05:25 PM   #31
Lifetime Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
7point62's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Decisive Terrain
Posts: 2,188
Liked 1564 Times on 779 Posts
Likes Given: 1205


Originally Posted by Mercator View Post
I think 7.62 was referring to the German armed forces as a whole, not an individual Tiger tank. Other blokes have pointed out that the Shermans won by their superior numbers and speed, certainly not one on one.

Yep, that's exactly what I meant...Not arguing that the Germans had the best tanks. But the U.S. produced some 88,816 tanks of all kinds during WW2--according to the numbers I've got. And not to mention that at various times we were pounding Germany's sources of oil, fuel and spare parts from the well as the transportation networks that kept the Tigers and Panzers going. So...all things considered...we made the Nazi's our bitch.

Hijo de mala leche
7point62 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2014, 01:36 AM   #32
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 218
Liked 25 Times on 20 Posts
Likes Given: 2


One thing that worries me - I wonder if we aren't like the Germans in that we rely on expensive, difficult to produce, super-duper systems.

My Motto: Vanquish Fear & Panic!
My blog: GunGator's Gun Blog
GatorDude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2014, 03:03 AM   #33
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,068
Liked 280 Times on 200 Posts
Likes Given: 30


GatorDude :
Our strategy is at times like that of the NAZIs . We occupy countries and are surprised at how hard it is to control a hostile population or portion thereof .

From the shows I've seen on The Military Channel, I'd conclude that the Tiger tank and other heavies had an effect all out of proportion to its numbers . They probably stopped or stalled countless allied advances long enough for German gunners to zero in 88s or for reinforcements to arrive .

I'm surprised to learn that the Pershings were even built during WWII . That fact shows that America tried to field a heavy tank .

Blitzkrieg cannot be pooh-poohed . It represented a new kind of warfare that overcame fixed fortifications, scattered tanks, troops without air cover etc. It filled the roads with refugees, kept its opponents off balance confused opposing generals about battlefield situations and used unprecedented coordination of land and air .
Rentacop is offline  
alsaqr Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2014, 12:14 PM   #34
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
clr8ter's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 4,015
Liked 1346 Times on 901 Posts
Likes Given: 860


Our strategy is at times like that of the NAZIs . We occupy countries and are surprised at how hard it is to control a hostile population or portion thereof .
It's probably only hard because we want to be PC and "nice" about it. Basically, we do it like a buncha pussies. IMHO, most of the time, we shouldn't be there in the 1st place.....
I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?
clr8ter is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Wwii 303tom The Club House 1 02-23-2014 06:21 PM
2 more unmarked tanks traveling west down 74 through IL this morning purehavoc Conspiracy 19 03-25-2013 05:29 PM
Tanks against the Taliban? Mack Bolan Politics, Religion and Controversy 9 11-20-2010 04:51 PM
Best WWII smg? jestsumguy Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 28 04-03-2010 02:23 AM
WWII in HD gadrooning The Club House 1 02-27-2010 04:31 PM